Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39830259›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm Imaging: A Systematic Review.

Muhammad Ibtsaam Qadir, Jackson A Baril, Michele T Yip-Schneider, Duane Schonlau, Thi Thanh Thoa Tran, C Max Schmidt, Fiona R Kolbinger

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Muhammad Ibtsaam QadirWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-5521-2855
Jackson A BarilDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Michele T Yip-SchneiderDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Duane SchonlauDepartment of Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Thi Thanh Thoa TranDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
C Max SchmidtDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Fiona R KolbingerWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2265-4809

Funding

Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUM1TR004402 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Sharon M Moe, Sarah Elizabeth Wiehe · 2023 to 2026
$21.6M
Surgical Oncology Research Training at Indiana (SORTI)T32CA282070 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI KARL Y BILIMORIA, Harikrishna Nakshatri · 2024 to 2026
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004402NCI NIH HHS T32 CA282070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Based on the Fukuoka and Kyoto international consensus guidelines, the current clinical management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) largely depends on imaging features. While these criteria are highly sensitive in detecting high-risk IPMN, they lack specificity, resulting in surgical overtreatment. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based medical image analysis has the potential to augment the clinical management of IPMNs by improving diagnostic accuracy. Methods: Based on a systematic review of the academic literature on AI in IPMN imaging, 1041 publications were identified of which 25 published studies were included in the analysis. The studies were stratified based on prediction target, underlying data type and imaging modality, patient cohort size, and stage of clinical translation and were subsequently analyzed to identify trends and gaps in the field. Results: Research on AI in IPMN imaging has been increasing in recent years. The majority of studies utilized CT imaging to train computational models. Most studies presented computational models developed on single-center datasets (n=11,44%) and included less than 250 patients (n=18,72%). Methodologically, convolutional neural network (CNN)-based algorithms were most commonly used. Thematically, most studies reported models augmenting differential diagnosis (n=9,36%) or risk stratification (n=10,40%) rather than IPMN detection (n=5,20%) or IPMN segmentation (n=2,8%). Conclusion: This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the research landscape of AI in IPMN imaging. Computational models have potential to enhance the accurate and precise stratification of patients with IPMN. Multicenter collaboration and datasets comprising various modalities are necessary to fully utilize this potential, alongside concerted efforts towards clinical translation.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceintraductal papillary mucinous neoplasmmedical imagingpancreatic cystspancreatic surgery

Identifiers

PMID39830259
PMCPMC11741484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.