ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Machine learning for estimating and comparing clinical rules for treating diarrheal illness with antibiotics.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute diarrheal disease is one of the leading causes of death in children under age 5, disproportionately impacting children in low-resource settings. Many of these cases are caused by bacteria and therefore could respond to antibiotic treatment; however, the benefits of widely prescribing antibiotics must be weighed against the risks for the emergence of microbial resistance. These challenges present the opportunity for developing individualized treatment guidelines for diarrheal disease. In this study, we utilize a framework for the creation and evaluation of individualized treatment rules that leverage diagnostic and other clinical information to recommend antibiotic treatment to children with watery diarrhea. In contrast to many applications of pipelines for creating and evaluating treatment rules, we (i) explicitly consider creating rules that limit the proportion of children treated under a rule, to limit risks for overtreatment and the emergence of microbial resistance and (ii) propose methods to compare the performance of rules based on different sets of input covariates, which allows for quantification of the impact of measuring additional diagnostic biomarkers in clinical settings. We use a nested cross validation procedure that makes use of ensemble machine learning and doubly-robust estimation approach to derive, evaluate, and compare rules. We demonstrate that our proposed method yields appropriate inference in a realistic simulation study and apply our method to a real-data analysis of the AntiBiotics for Children with severe Diarrhea (ABCD) trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.