ArticleJournal of the advanced practitioner in oncology2024
Obinutuzumab Infusion-Related Reactions: Multicenter Retrospective Evaluation of Incidence, Severity, and Risk Factors.
Article in Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retrospective study of infusion-related reactions in subcutaneous daratumumab administration in Japan.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
- Obinutuzumab as a therapeutic option for SDNS children resistant to rituximab with anti-RTX antibodies.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- Real-world safety and tolerability of rapid infusion obinutuzumab in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, small lymphocytic lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a provincial review.Haematologica · 2026Article
- Fitness beyond age: Multidisciplinary expert opinion on redefining fitness for targeted therapies in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.HemaSphere · 2026Article
- Obinutuzumab in kidney transplantation: Past, present, and future.World journal of transplantation · 2025Review
- Safety assessment of obinutuzumab: Real-world adverse event analysis based on the FAERS and JADER databases from 2013 to 2025.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Despite standard prevention strategies, obinutuzumab carries a significant risk of infusion-related reactions (IRRs) for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). Reported rates of IRRs vary in phase III clinical trials evaluating obinutuzumab-containing regimens. Although obinutuzumab has a higher rate of severe (grade 3 and higher) IRRs than rituximab, clinical risk factors predicting IRR have not been identified, and therefore strata informing patient-specific risk of IRR have not been applied in practice. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective evaluation of patients with CLL/SLL estimated the incidence of obinutuzumab-related IRRs and evaluated risk factors for the development of IRR in a real-world population. Results: 68 patients with untreated or previously treated CLL/SLL were included in the analysis, with the majority being older adult (median age = 70) males (61.8%) with Rai stage III and IV CLL. All-grade IRRs occurred in 25% of patients, and severe IRRs occurred in 1.5% of patients. Of the variables evaluated, absolute lymphocyte count was a significant predictor ( Conclusion: Obinutuzumab IRR rates in a real-world population were comparable to most phase III clinical trial results succeeding implementation of split dosing and standard premedication. Absolute lymphocyte count is a statistically significant predictor for increased odds of experiencing an IRR. Future research evaluating risk-adapted obinutuzumab administration strategies is needed to recommend a specific approach.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.