Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39830188›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

The reliability and quality of short videos as health information of guidance for lymphedema: a cross-sectional study.

Xuchuan Zhou, Gejia Ma, Xuefeng Su, Xinyi Li, Wenfei Wang, Linxi Xia, Chen Yang, Bin Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xuchuan Zhou *Department of Burn, Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Xi'an Central Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Gejia Ma *Department of Burn, Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Xi'an Central Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Xuefeng Su *Department of Burn, Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Xi'an Central Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Xinyi LiDepartment of Burn, Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Xi'an Central Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Wenfei WangDepartment of Burn, Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Xi'an Central Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Linxi XiaDepartment of Burn, Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Xi'an Central Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Chen YangDepartment of Burn, Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Xi'an Central Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Bin LiuDepartment of Burn, Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, Xi'an Central Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of lymphedema is rising, necessitating accurate diagnostic and treatment information for affected patients. Short video-sharing platforms facilitate access to such information but require validation regarding the reliability and quality of the content presented. This study aimed to assess the reliability and quality of lymphedema-related information on Chinese short video-sharing platforms. Methods: We collected 111 video samples addressing the diagnosis and treatment of lymphedema from four platforms: TikTok, Bilibili, WeChat, and Microblog. Two independent surgeons evaluated each video for content comprehensiveness, quality (using the Global Quality Score), and reliability (using the modified DISCERN tool). The videos from different sources were subsequently compared and analyzed. Results: Out of 111 videos analyzed, 66 (59.46%) were uploaded by medical professionals, including breast surgeons, vascular surgeons, plastic surgeons, physical therapists, and gynecologists, while 45 (40.54%) were shared by non-medical professionals such as science bloggers, medical institutions, and lymphedema patients. Patient-uploaded videos received the highest engagement, with median likes of 2,257 (IQR: 246.25-10998.25) and favorites of 399 (IQR: 94.5-1794.75). 13 videos (11.71%) contained inaccuracies. Medical professionals' videos generally showed higher content comprehensiveness, particularly those by plastic surgeons, compared to non-medical professionals. The GQS and modified DISCERN tool were used to assess video quality and reliability respectively, with medical professionals scoring higher on both metrics ( Conclusion: Our study shows that lymphedema-related videos on short video platforms vary widely in quality. Videos by medical professionals are generally more accurate and of higher quality than those by non-professionals. However, patient-uploaded videos often get more engagement due to their relatability. To ensure public access to reliable information, establishing basic standards for this content is essential.

Indexed as

Information DisseminationLymphedemaVideo RecordingChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansReproducibility of Resultsinformation qualitylymphedemashort videossocial mediaTikTok

Identifiers

PMID39830188
PMCPMC11739071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.