Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39830179›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

How do neighborhood environments impact adolescent health: a comprehensive study from subjective and objective perspectives using machine learning method.

Jie Sheng, Zhenhai Xiang, Pengfei Ban

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jie ShengSchool of Architecture and Urban Planning, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China.
Zhenhai XiangSchool of Architecture and Urban Planning, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China.
Pengfei BanSchool of Architecture and Urban Planning, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing studies have established a linear relationship between urban environments and adolescent health, but the combined impacts of subjective and objective environments on multi-dimensional health status (including physical and mental health) have not been fully explored. Furthermore, while some studies have examined the non-linear relationship between urban environments and adult health, research specifically focusing on adolescents is sparse. Using Kunming, China, as a case study, we employ Random Forest model to examine the non-linear relationship between subjective/objective neighborhood environments and adolescent physical/mental health. The results indicate that the objective environment plays a more significant role in influencing physical and mental health in adolescents. There are generally non-linear correlations and threshold effects between neighborhood environment variables and adolescents' health status. Specifically, the effects of distance to subway station, ratio of traffic safety facilities, and greening view index on adolescent physical and mental health differ. Additionally, subjective environments characterized by community management, community image, and community capital tend to positively influence adolescents' health status. This study provides valuable insights for the planning of healthy communities, environmental interventions, and health promotion in specific dimensions among adolescents.

Indexed as

Adolescent HealthEnvironment DesignHealth StatusMachine LearningNeighborhood CharacteristicsResidence CharacteristicsAdolescentChinaFemaleHumansMaleMental Healthadolescentmental healthneighborhood environmentnon-linear relationshipphysical healthrandom forest

Identifiers

PMID39830179
PMCPMC11739073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.