ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
STI/HIV risk prediction model development-A novel use of public data to forecast STIs/HIV risk for men who have sex with men.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in HIV research, policy, and clinical care.The lancet. HIV · 2026Review
- The Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict HIV Testing Using Evidence from the 2002-2017 South African Adult Population-Based Surveys: An HIV Testing Predictive Model.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Article
- Visualizing and Analyzing Global Trends and Frontier Research in HIV Reservoirs: A Bibliometric Study from 1994 to 2023.Current HIV research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A novel automatic framework is proposed for global sexually transmissible infections (STIs) and HIV risk prediction. Four machine learning methods, namely, Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Random Forest (RF), XG Boost, and Ensemble learning GBM-RF-XG Boost are applied and evaluated on the Demographic and Health Surveys Program (DHSP), with thirteen features ultimately selected as the most predictive features. Classification and generalization experiments are conducted to test the accuracy, F1-score, precision, and area under the curve (AUC) performance of these four algorithms. Two imbalanced data solutions are also applied to reduce bias for classification performance improvement. The experimental results of these models demonstrate that the Random Forest algorithm yields the best results on HIV prediction, whereby the highest accuracy, and AUC are 0.99 and 0.99, respectively. The performance of the STI prediction achieves the best when the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) is applied (Accuracy = 0.99, AUC = 0.99), which outperforms the state-of-the-art baselines. Two possible factors that may affect the classification and generalization performance are further analyzed. This automatic classification model helps to improve convenience and reduce the cost of HIV testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.