ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025
A Hospital-Based, Single-Center, Cross-Sectional Study to Investigate the
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This is a hospital-based, single-center, cross-sectional study to investigate the Methods: All health adults (≥18 years old) undergoing health examination from 2020 Oct 1 to 2021 September 30 in a general hospital were enrolled. Their medical records were investigated and analyzed. Results: Total 4604 participants (2938 males and 1756 females) were included and analyzed. We found that although the participants in Shenzhen were younger than the people included the analogous study in the adjacent cities (total 38.41 ± 10.33 years, 39.11 ± 10.18 in males and 37.24 ± 10.47 in females), the prevalence of HUA reached to amazing 34.7% (43.5% in males and 20.1% in females). Moreover, great HUA-related gender difference was found in terms of age-related variation trends of HUA prevalence ( Conclusion: These results raise alarm bells for the HUA problem in the booming seaside city with young population like Shenzhen in China (2020-2021). Effective measures are appealed to reduce the high prevalence of HUA of Shenzhen. In addition, during analyses of the data, we found that both the prevalence of HUA and age of the population need to be seriously considered. Accordingly, we propose a more representative index, namely "Prevalence-Age Index (PAI = Prevalence of HUA/Average age)" to be used in the future HUA-related investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.