Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39830126›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2024

Biophysical assays to test cellular mechanosensing: moving towards high throughput.

Marta Cubero-Sarabia, Anna Maria Kapetanaki, Massimo Vassalli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Biophysical reviews · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marta Cubero-Sarabia *James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Anna Maria Kapetanaki *James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Massimo VassalliJames Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanosensitivity is the ability of cells to sense and respond to mechanical stimuli. In order to do this, cells are endowed with different components that allow them to react to a broad range of stimuli, such as compression or shear forces, pressure, and vibrations. This sensing process, mechanosensing, is involved in fundamental physiological mechanisms, such as stem cell differentiation and migration, but it is also central to the development of pathogenic states. Here, we review the approaches that have been proposed to quantify mechanosensation in living cells, with a specific focus on methodologies that enable higher experimental throughput. This aspect is crucial to fully understand the nuances of mechanosensation and how it impacts the physiology and pathology of living systems. We will discuss traditional methods for studying mechanosensing at the level of single cells, with particular attention to the activation of the mechanosensitive ion channel piezo1. Moreover, we will present recent attempts to push the analysis towards higher throughput.

Indexed as

Atomic force microscopyCell mechanicsMechanobiologyMechanosensitivityPiezo1

Identifiers

PMID39830126
PMCPMC11735701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.