ReviewBiophysical reviews2024
Tracing the birth and intrinsic disorder of loops and domains in protein evolution.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tracing Molecular Chronologies Onto Growing Biological Networks.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein loops and structural domains are building blocks of molecular structure. They hold evolutionary memory and are largely responsible for the many functions and processes that drive the living world. Here, we briefly review two decades of phylogenomic data-driven research focusing on the emergence and evolution of these elemental architects of protein structure. Phylogenetic trees of domains reconstructed from the proteomes of organisms belonging to all three superkingdoms and viruses were used to build chronological timelines describing the origin of each domain and its embedded loops at different levels of structural abstraction. These timelines consistently recovered six distinct evolutionary phases and a most parsimonious evolutionary progression of cellular life. The timelines also traced the birth of domain structures from loops, which allowed to model their growth ab initio with AlphaFold2. Accretion decreased the disorder of the growing molecules, suggesting disorder is molecular size-dependent. A phylogenomic survey of disorder revealed that loops and domains evolved differently. Loops were highly disordered, disorder increased early in evolution, and ordered and moderate disordered structures were derived. Gradual replacement of loops with α-helix and β-strand bracing structures over time paved the way for the dominance of more disordered loop types. In contrast, ancient domains were ordered, with disorder evolving as a benefit acquired later in evolution. These evolutionary patterns explain inverse correlations between disorder and sequence length of loops and domains. Our findings provide a deep evolutionary view of the link between structure, disorder, flexibility, and function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.