ReviewThe Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS2024
Global Research Trends in Cervical Cancer Survival in the Last Two Decades: A Bibliometric Analysis.
Review in The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer poses a significant challenge to global health, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Tracking the survival rates of cancer patients through data gathered by population-based cancer registries constitutes a crucial aspect of cancer management. In recent years, attention within bibliometric studies has been directed towards examining the correlation between inflammation and radiotherapy in cervical cancer. However, to date, there is no published literature investigating research trends in cervical cancer survival through bibliometric analysis. Thus, this study was undertaken to identify and analyse global research patterns and hotpots in this area. A systematic search was performed within the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database, employing the following search parameters: TITLE - (((survival) OR (survival rate) OR (survival analysis) OR (survival probability)) AND ((cervical cancer) OR (cervical carcinoma))). A comprehensive analysis of research trends was conducted utilising various tools on the WoSCC website and VOSviewer. A total of 840 papers pertaining to cervical cancer and survival were identified from 45 distinct departments or subjects. Notably, the People's Republic of China and the USA collectively accounted for half of all publications from 2000 to 2023. An extensive cohort comprising 4,759 authors affiliated with 1,454 institutions across 82 countries contributed to the progression of this research domain. Despite a substantial increase in research on cervical cancer survival over the last decade, it is essential to encourage and conduct research, particularly in high-risk regions, especially in countries classified as low- or middle-income.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.