Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39830036›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2025

Contezolid Harbored Equivalent Efficacy to Linezolid in Tuberculosis Treatment in a Prospective and Randomized Early Bactericidal Activity Study.

Guanglu Jiang, Rongmei Liu, Yi Xue, Qiping Ge, Lihui Nie, Zizheng Lv, Zhongshun Kong, Jin Shi, Hongmei Chen, Hua Li and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Antimicrobial Resistance: The Answers.British journal of biomedical science · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Guanglu Jiang *National Clinical Laboratory on Tuberculosis, Beijing Key Laboratory on Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Rongmei Liu *Department of Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yi XueNational Clinical Laboratory on Tuberculosis, Beijing Key Laboratory on Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Qiping GeDepartment of Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Lihui NieDepartment of Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zizheng LvDepartment of Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zhongshun KongDepartment of Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jin ShiDepartment of Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Hongmei ChenDepartment of Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Hua LiDepartment of Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoguang WuDepartment of Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Li XieDepartment of Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yanhua SongDepartment of Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Hairong HuangNational Clinical Laboratory on Tuberculosis, Beijing Key Laboratory on Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-4295-4262
Mengqiu GaoDepartment of Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Contezolid (CZD) is an analog of Linezolid (LZD) that has demonstrated potent in vitro and in vivo activity against tuberculosis (TB) while presenting a safer side-effect profile. In this study, we evaluated the early bactericidal activity (EBA) of CZD compared to LZD, with LZD serving as a control. Methods: Naive, smear-positive pulmonary TB patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either a 14-day monotherapy regimen of 600 mg LZD once daily (QD) or 800 mg CZD twice daily (BID). Sputum samples were collected daily starting one day before treatment initiation and continuing throughout the treatment period. Each sample was processed for the enumeration of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) colonies, and time-to-positivity (TTP) during MGIT960 liquid culture was recorded. Results: A total of 10 eligible patients were enrolled in each treatment group, although one patient in the CZD group was later excluded from the analysis. The early bactericidal activity (EBA0-14) was 0.08 ± 0.12 log CFU/mL/day (95% CI: -0.02 to 0.18 CFU/mL/day) in the CZD group, compared to 0.03 ± 0.10 log CFU/mL/day (95% CI: -0.05 to 0.10 CFU/mL/day) in the LZD group. The increase in time-to-positivity (TTP0-14) was 38.6 ± 43.69 hours (95% CI: -1.85 to 79 hours) in the CZD group and 27.7 ± 78.21 hours (95% CI: -28.15 to 83.75 hours) in the LZD group. LZD showed rapid bacterial reduction in sputum during the first two days of treatment, whereas CZD demonstrated superior efficacy after a few days of treatment. Conclusion: 800 mg BID contezolid exhibited comparable efficacy to 600 mg QD LZD in treating pulmonary TB in this EBA study. While CZD showed slower initial bactericidal action compared to LZD, its efficacy surpassed that of LZD after a few days of treatment. Given its similar efficacy and superior safety profile, contezolid may serve as an alternative to linezolid for the treatment of tuberculosis.

Indexed as

contezolidearly bactericidal activitylinezolidtime-to-positivity

Identifiers

PMID39830036
PMCPMC11742132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.