Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39829899›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Saumya Sharma, Vishal Bharti, Prosad Kumar Das, Abdul Rahman, Harshita Sharma, Riya Rauthan, Madhumita Rc, Neerja Gupta, Rashmi Shukla, Sujata Mohanty and 3 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Saumya Sharma
Vishal Bharti
Prosad Kumar Das
Abdul Rahman
Harshita Sharma
Riya Rauthan
Madhumita Rc
Neerja Gupta
Rashmi Shukla
Madhulika Kabra
Debojyoti ChakrabortyORCID 0000-0003-1460-7594

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Megalencephalic leukoencephalopathy with subcortical cysts (MLC), a rare and progressive neurodegenerative disorder involving the white matter, is not adequately recapitulated by current disease models. Somatic cell reprogramming, along with advancements in genome engineering, may allow the establishment of Methods: Somatic cell reprogramming of peripheral patient-derived blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was used to develop iPSC models of MLC. CRISPR-Cas9 system-based genome engineering was also utilized to create the Results: MLC iPSCs established by somatic cell reprogramming and genome engineering were well characterized for pluripotency. iPSCs were subsequently differentiated to disease-relevant cell types: neural stem cells (NSCs) and astrocytes. RNA sequencing profiling of MLC NSCs revealed a set of differentially expressed genes related to neurological disorders and epilepsy, a common clinical finding within MLC disease. This gene set can serve as a target for drug screening for the development of a potential therapeutic for this disease. Upon differentiation to the more disease relevant cell type-astrocytes, MLC-characteristic vacuoles were clearly observed, which were distinctly absent from controls. This emergence recapitulated a distinguishing phenotypic marker of the disease. Conclusion: Through the creation and analyses of iPSC models of MLC, our work addresses a critical need for relevant cellular models of MLC for use in both disease modeling and drug screening assays. Further investigation can utilize MLC iPSC models, as well as generated transcriptomic data sets and analyses, to identify potential therapeutic interventions for this debilitating disease.

Identifiers

PMID39829899
PMCPMC11741324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.