Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39829858›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Characterization and automated classification of sentences in the biomedical literature: a case study for biocuration of gene expression and protein kinase activity.

Daniela Raciti, Kimberly M Van Auken, Valerio Arnaboldi, Christopher J Tabone, Hans-Michael Muller, Paul W Sternberg

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniela RacitiDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, 1200 E. California Boulevard, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4945-5837
Kimberly M Van AukenDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, 1200 E. California Boulevard, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1706-4196
Valerio ArnaboldiDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, 1200 E. California Boulevard, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2563-5374
Christopher J TaboneThe Jackson Laboratory, 600 Main Street, Bar Harbor, ME 04609, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8746-0680
Hans-Michael MullerDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, 1200 E. California Boulevard, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Paul W SternbergDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, 1200 E. California Boulevard, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7699-0173

Funding

Text mining in the CloudU24HG010859 · NHGRI · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CAROL J BULT, PAUL Warren STERNBERG · 2019 to 2026
$42.0M
Resource Project CoreU41HG000739 · NHGRI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI PERRIMON, NORBERT · 2014 to 2022
$32.3M
WormBase: a core data resource for C. elegans and other nematodesU24HG002223 · NHGRI · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI TIM SCHEDL, PAUL Warren STERNBERG · 2018 to 2026
$18.9M
Enhancing the C. elegans animal resource through genome editingR24OD023041 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ROUGVIE, ANN E., STERNBERG, PAUL WARREN · 2017 to 2024
$5.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG002223NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG010859NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG000739NIH HHS R24 OD023041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological knowledgebases are essential resources for biomedical researchers, providing ready access to gene function and genomic data. Professional, manual curation of knowledgebases, however, is labor-intensive and thus high-performing machine learning methods that improve biocuration efficiency are needed. Here we report on sentence-level classification to identify biocuration-relevant sentences in the full text of published references for two gene function data types: gene expression and protein kinase activity. We performed a detailed characterization of sentences from references in the WormBase bibliography and used this characterization to define three tasks for classifying sentences as either 1) fully curatable, 2) fully and partially curatable, or 3) all language-related. We evaluated various machine learning (ML) models applied to these tasks and found that GPT and BioBERT achieve the highest average performance, resulting in F1 performance scores ranging from 0.89 to 0.99 depending upon the task. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of extracting biocuration-relevant sentences from full text. Integrating these models into professional biocuration workflows, such as those used by the Alliance of Genome Resources and the ACKnowledge community curation platform, might well facilitate efficient and accurate annotation of the biomedical literature.

Indexed as

BERTBiocurationbiomedical text classificationGPTLLMssentence classification

Identifiers

PMID39829858
PMCPMC11741306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.