Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39829845›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Deep Learning for Biomarker Discovery in Cancer Genomes.

Michaela Unger, Chiara M L Loeffler, Laura Žigutytė, Srividhya Sainath, Tim Lenz, Julien Vibert, Andreas Mock, Stefan Fröhling, Trevor A Graham, Zunamys I Carrero and 1 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Michaela UngerElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, University of Technology Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5811-0200
Chiara M L LoefflerElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, University of Technology Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-9659-5194
Laura ŽigutytėElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, University of Technology Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-2447-2959
Srividhya SainathElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, University of Technology Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-6227-747X
Tim LenzElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, University of Technology Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9034-2535
Julien VibertDrug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2370-3302
Andreas MockInstitute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University München, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3332-9166
Stefan FröhlingDivision of Translational Medical Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7907-4595
Trevor A GrahamCentre for Evolution and Cancer, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9582-1597
Zunamys I CarreroElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, University of Technology Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8501-1566
Jakob Nikolas KatherElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, University of Technology Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3730-5348

Funding

Integration of epidemiology, pathology, immunology and outcomes in colorectal cancerR01CA263318 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI STEPHEN B GRUBER · 2022 to 2026
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA263318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Genomic data is essential for clinical decision-making in precision oncology. Bioinformatic algorithms are widely used to analyze next-generation sequencing (NGS) data, but they face two major challenges. First, these pipelines are highly complex, involving multiple steps and the integration of various tools. Second, they generate features that are human-interpretable but often result in information loss by focusing only on predefined genetic properties. This limitation restricts the full potential of NGS data in biomarker extraction and slows the discovery of new biomarkers in precision oncology. Methods: We propose an end-to-end deep learning (DL) approach for analyzing NGS data. Specifically, we developed a multiple instance learning DL framework that integrates somatic mutation sequences to predict two compound biomarkers: microsatellite instability (MSI) and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). To achieve this, we utilized data from 3,184 cancer patients obtained from two public databases: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Clinical Proteome Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC). Results: Our proposed deep learning method demonstrated high accuracy in identifying clinically relevant biomarkers. For predicting MSI status, the model achieved an accuracy of 0.98, a sensitivity of 0.95, and a specificity of 1.00 on an external validation cohort. For predicting HRD status, the model achieved an accuracy of 0.80, a sensitivity of 0.75, and a specificity of 0.86. Furthermore, the deep learning approach significantly outperformed traditional machine learning methods in both tasks (MSI accuracy, p-value = 5.11×10 Conclusion: We demonstrate that deep learning can identify patterns in unfiltered somatic mutations without the need for manual feature extraction. This approach enhances the detection of actionable targets and paves the way for developing NGS-based biomarkers using minimally processed data.

Indexed as

AIBiomarkerCancer GenomicsDeep LearningHomologous Recombination DeficiencyMicrosatellite Instability

Identifiers

PMID39829845
PMCPMC11741323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.