Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39829822›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

ATTENTION MODULATES STIMULUS REPRESENTATIONS IN NEURAL FEATURE DIMENSION MAPS.

Daniel D Thayer, Thomas C Sprague

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel D ThayerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Thomas C SpragueDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara.

Funding

Probing the role of feature dimension maps in visual cognitionR01EY035300 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI THOMAS C SPRAGUE · 2023 to 2026
$1.4M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY035300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational theories posit that attention is guided by a combination of spatial maps for individual features that can be dynamically weighted according to task goals. Consistent with this framework, when a stimulus contains several features, attending to one or another feature results in stronger fMRI responses in regions preferring the attended feature. We hypothesized that multivariate activation patterns across feature-responsive cortical regions form spatial 'feature dimension maps', which combine to guide attentional priority. We tested this prediction by reconstructing spatial maps from fMRI activation patterns across retinotopic regions of visual cortex while participants performed a feature-selective attention task. Participants viewed a peripheral visual stimulus at a random location which always contained moving colored dots. On each trial, participants were precued to report the predominant direction of motion or color of the stimulus, or to attend fixation. Stimulus representations in reconstructed maps based on a spatial inverted encoding model were selectively enhanced in color-selective regions when color was attended, and in motion-selective regions when motion was attended. While enhancement was localized to the stimulus position in color-selective regions, modulations in motion-selective regions was consistent with a more global enhancement when motion was task relevant. These results suggest feature-selective cortical regions support 'neural feature dimension maps': spatial maps of different visual features that are dynamically reweighted based on task demands to guide visual behavior to the most relevant locations based on important features.

Indexed as

feature-selective attentionfMRIpriority mapvisual system

Identifiers

PMID39829822
PMCPMC11741479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.