ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Spike rate inference from mouse spinal cord calcium imaging data.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Calcium imaging is a key method to record the spiking activity of identified and genetically targeted neurons. However, the observed calcium signals are only an indirect readout of the underlying electrophysiological events (single spikes or bursts of spikes) and require dedicated algorithms to recover the spike rate. These algorithms for spike inference can be optimized using ground truth data from combined electrical and optical recordings, but it is not clear how such optimized algorithms perform on cell types and brain regions for which ground truth does not exist. Here, we use a state-of-the-art algorithm based on supervised deep learning (CASCADE) and a non-supervised algorithm based on non-negative deconvolution (OASIS) to test spike rate inference in spinal cord neurons. To enable these tests, we recorded specific ground truth from glutamatergic and GABAergic somatosensory neurons in the superficial dorsal horn of spinal cord in mice of both sexes. We find that CASCADE and OASIS algorithms that were designed for cortical excitatory neurons generalize well to both spinal cord cell types. However, CASCADE models re-trained on our ground truth further improved the performance, resulting in a more accurate inference of spiking activity from spinal cord neurons. We openly provide re-trained models that can be applied to spinal cord data of variable noise levels and frame rates. Together, our ground-truth recordings and analyses provide a solid foundation for the interpretation of calcium imaging data from spinal cord dorsal horn and showcase how spike rate inference can generalize between different regions of the nervous system.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.