ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Source of dietary protein alters the abundance of proteases, intestinal epithelial and immune proteins both directly and via interactions with the gut microbiota.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dietary protein has been shown to impact long-term health outcomes differentially depending on its amount and source. It has been suggested that interactions of the gut microbiota with dietary proteins mediate some of the effects of dietary protein on health outcomes. However, it remains unclear what specific host responses drive the health effects of dietary proteins from different plant and animal sources. Additionally, which specific host responses are mediated by interactions of dietary protein source with the gut microbiota and which host responses are caused by dietary proteins directly is not well understood. We used metaproteomics to quantify dietary, host, and microbial proteins in fecal samples of conventional and germ-free mice fed purified dietary protein from six different plant and animal sources, including casein, egg-white, soy, brown rice, pea, and yeast. We characterized differences in the host fecal proteome across the six dietary protein sources as well as between the conventional and germ-free mice for each source to determine how the host responds to the different dietary protein sources and the role of the gut microbiota in mediating these responses. We found that both the source of dietary protein and the presence or absence of the gut microbiota drive the host response to dietary protein source in the fecal host proteome. Host proteins pertaining to immune response, digestion, and barrier function were differentially abundant in different protein sources with and without the gut microbiota. These changes in the host response correlated with changes in microbial composition and differences in protein digestibility. Our results show how dietary protein sources, through their interactions with the gut microbiota, impact several aspects of host physiology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.