Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39829718›Full record

Observational studyTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2024

The Clinical Significance of HLA Compatibility Scores in Lung Transplantation.

Liesbeth Daniëls, Hanne Beeckmans, Andrea Zajacova, Pieterjan Kerckhof, Saskia Bos, Maarten Naesens, Bart Vanaudenaerde, Frans Claas, Robin Vos

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Anti-HLA antibodies in lung transplantation: diagnostic pitfalls and future directions.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Liesbeth DaniëlsHistocompatibility Laboratory (HLA), Clinical Biology, CHU UCL Namur Site Godinne, Namur, Belgium.
Hanne BeeckmansDepartment of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, Laboratory for Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Andrea ZajacovaDepartment of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, Laboratory for Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Pieterjan KerckhofDepartment of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, Laboratory for Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Saskia BosDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Brussels, Belgium.
Maarten NaesensDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Bart VanaudenaerdeDepartment of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, Laboratory for Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Frans ClaasEurotransplant and Eurotransplant Reference Laboratory, Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands.
Robin VosDepartment of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, Laboratory for Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung transplantation is a life-saving therapeutic option for many chronic end-stage pulmonary diseases, but long-term survival may be limited by rejection of the transplanted organ. Since HLA disparity between donor and recipient plays a major role in rejection, we performed a single center, retrospective observational cohort analysis in our lung transplant cohort (n = 128) in which we calculated HLA compatibility scores for B-cell epitopes (HLAMatchmaker, HLA-EMMA), T-cell epitopes (PIRCHE-II) and missing self-induced NK cell activation (KIR Ligand Calculator). Adjusted Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the association between mismatched scores and time to development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) post-transplant, time to first biopsy-proven acute rejection episode, freedom from CLAD, graft survival and overall survival. For time to first DSA, HLA-EMMA DQB1 scores and PIRCHE-II DQB1 scores were significantly associated with more rapidly developing anti-HLA-DQ antibodies. HLA-EMMA DQB1 score was significantly associated with worse survival. KIR ligand Host-versus-Graft (HvG) mismatches was significantly associated with worse graft survival (CLAD or death) and shorter time to first biopsy-proven rejection when 2 mismatches were present. We demonstrated that HLA-DQB1 compatibility scores and KIR ligand HvG 2 mismatches may allow for identification of recipients at risk of poor long-term outcomes after lung transplantation.

Indexed as

HLA AntigensLung TransplantationAdultAgedClinical RelevanceFemaleGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHistocompatibilityHistocompatibility TestingHumansMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesHLA AntigensHLA-EMMAHLAMatchmakerKIR ligand calculatorlung transplantationPIRCHE-II

Identifiers

PMID39829718
PMCPMC11738610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.