ReviewiScience2025
Clinical applications of nanoprobes of high-resolution
Review in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanophotonics in Molecular Imaging and Biomedicine: Diagnostics, Therapies, and Translational Challenges.Molecular imaging and biology · 2025Review
- Advances in NIR-II Fluorescent Nanoprobes: Design Principles, Optical Engineering, and Emerging Translational Directions.Micromachines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, the primary imaging methods used in clinical diagnosis are X-ray, computed tomography (CT), ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), PET-CT, etc. The sensitivity and accuracy of these imaging methods bring many difficulties in clinical diagnosis; at the same time, CT, X-ray, PET-CT, etc. can cause radiation to the human body; some invasive operations of the gold standard bring much pain to the patients. Some of these tests are costly and do not allow real-time
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.