ArticleVeterinary world2024
Coinfection of gastrointestinal parasites with paratuberculosis in naturally infected sheep.
Article in Veterinary world, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Materials and Methods: A total of 207 sheep (118 AS and 89 TS) were randomly selected from local butcher shops and slaughterhouses. Fecal and tissue samples from the ileum and mesenteric lymph nodes were collected. Fecal samples were screened for the presence of parasitic ova and oocysts. Hematoxylin-and-eosin-stained and Ziehl-Neelsen-stained tissues were examined for evidence of inflammation, acid-fast bacteria, and parasitic structures. Risk factor analysis was performed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: Mucosal thickening and corrugation of the ileum were found in AS sheep (74/113 [65.5%], 10/113 [8.8%], respectively) and TS sheep (21/88 [23.9%], 8/88 [9.1%], respectively). Histopathologically, diffuse multibacillary/histiocytic form was detected only in the AS sheep breed. AS sheep had higher levels of acid-fast bacteria in the ileum (70/113 [61.9%]) compared with TS sheep (34/88 [38.6%]). In addition, parasitic structure and severe eosinophilic inflammation were detected in AS (10/113 [8.8%], 108/113 [95.6%], respectively) and TS sheep (2/88 [2.3%], 70/88 [79.5%], respectively). Parasitic infections were detected in fecal samples from 15/118 (12.7%) AS sheep and 11/89 (12.4%) TS sheep. Coinfection between gastrointestinal parasites and paratuberculosis was detected histologically in 8/118 (7.1%) and 2/88 (2.3%) AS and TS sheep, respectively. Conclusion: Risk factor analysis indicated that the ileum from the AS sheep breed was 2.164 times more likely to have acid-fast bacteria and 2.874 times more likely to have eosinophilic infiltrations than the TS sheep breed. Results of this preliminary study may indicate the role of the sheep in the pathogenesis and shedding of MAP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.