Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39829618›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2025

Guidelines for standard operation of imaging modalities in orbital diseases (2024).

Yi Shao, Jian-Min Ma, Xiao-Ming Huang, Expert Workgroup of Guidelines for the use of imaging equipment in orbital diseases (2024); Ophthalmic Imaging and Intelligent Medicine Branch Chinese Medicine Education Association; Ocular Oncology Committee of the Ophthalmology Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association; Ophthalmology Committee of International Association of Translational Medicine; Chinese Ophthalmic Imaging Study Groups

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yi ShaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Shanghai 200080, China.
Jian-Min MaBeijing Tongren Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing 100005, China.
Xiao-Ming HuangSichuan Eye Hospital, Chendu 610047, Sichuan Province, China.
Expert Workgroup of Guidelines for the use of imaging equipment in orbital diseases (2024); Ophthalmic Imaging and Intelligent Medicine Branch Chinese Medicine Education Association; Ocular Oncology Committee of the Ophthalmology Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association; Ophthalmology Committee of International Association of Translational Medicine; Chinese Ophthalmic Imaging Study Groups

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orbital disorders include conditions originating from the orbital bones, surrounding tissues, and post-orbital septum. They also include systemic ailments affecting the orbit. Different clinical symptoms make up the complex range of orbital disorders. Because these disorders mostly impact the orbital area instead of the intraocular compartment, there is little diagnostic usefulness for typical ophthalmic visual tests. As such, the vital instruments for diagnosing and evaluating orbital illnesses have become ophthalmic imaging modalities, including ocular ultrasonography (B-scan), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). One way to improve the precision and promptness of diagnosing orbital diseases is to standardize the functioning of widely used imaging equipment and define the radiological features of orbital abnormalities. Such programs are crucial for the care of patients with orbital disorders since they considerably reduce the number of misdiagnoses and missed diagnoses in these individuals. The underlying concepts, operational techniques, and normal and pathological imaging findings associated with common diagnostic tools for orbital illnesses are all thoroughly reviewed in this guideline. The objective is to improve primary healthcare settings' diagnostic competence in the field of orbital pathology and to standardize procedures for diagnosing orbital disorders.

Indexed as

computed tomographymagnetic resonance imagingorbital diseasestandardized operationultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID39829618
PMCPMC11672101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.