ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2025
Guidelines for standard operation of imaging modalities in orbital diseases (2024).
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Equity and Generalizability of Radiomics in Orbital Disease: Challenges for Ophthalmology, Otolaryngology, and Plastic Surgery.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Innovative Applications of Nanomaterials in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Ocular Diseases: Targeted Delivery, Intelligent Therapy, Diagnostic Breakthroughs, and Synergistic Strategies with Stem Cells and Biomaterials.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Ultrasound localization microscopy for evaluation of therapeutic efficacy assessment after transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Applications of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Upper Eyelid Anatomy and Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty: A Systematic Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Automatic segmentation of calibration device boundaries on ophthalmic optical biometry instruments in optical coherence tomography images.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Assessment of Peripheral Arterial (Normal) Flows in Multiple Vascular Territories in Patients Receiving Mechanical Cardiac Support.Journal of cardiovascular echographyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orbital disorders include conditions originating from the orbital bones, surrounding tissues, and post-orbital septum. They also include systemic ailments affecting the orbit. Different clinical symptoms make up the complex range of orbital disorders. Because these disorders mostly impact the orbital area instead of the intraocular compartment, there is little diagnostic usefulness for typical ophthalmic visual tests. As such, the vital instruments for diagnosing and evaluating orbital illnesses have become ophthalmic imaging modalities, including ocular ultrasonography (B-scan), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). One way to improve the precision and promptness of diagnosing orbital diseases is to standardize the functioning of widely used imaging equipment and define the radiological features of orbital abnormalities. Such programs are crucial for the care of patients with orbital disorders since they considerably reduce the number of misdiagnoses and missed diagnoses in these individuals. The underlying concepts, operational techniques, and normal and pathological imaging findings associated with common diagnostic tools for orbital illnesses are all thoroughly reviewed in this guideline. The objective is to improve primary healthcare settings' diagnostic competence in the field of orbital pathology and to standardize procedures for diagnosing orbital disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.