ArticleACS omega2025
Unveiling with Density Functional Theory the Optical Property Variations of Three Kinds of Graphene for Acetaminophen Sensor Design.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the interactions between molecules and sensing elements is crucial to improving sensors. We present one step toward getting closer to the breach between theory and empirical sensor development. Through density functional theory (DFT) calculations, we explored the changes in some optical properties of pristine graphene (G), graphene oxide (GO), and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) interacting with one molecule of acetaminophen (APAP). The main goal is to unveil which graphene-G, GO, and rGO-works better as a substrate to detect APAP for sensor applications based on UV/vis and near-infrared absorption, refractive index changes, and plasmon resonances. For this effort, we used Quantum ESPRESSO software. We calculated each supercell's adsorption energy and recovery time containing the APAP and one graphene variant. Afterward, we calculated the optical absorption, refractive index, reflectivity, and electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS), a technique to identify the material's plasmons. Then, we analyzed the changeovers in the optical properties mentioned for each graphene layer with and without APAP. We found that G works for UV/vis and plasmon sensors operating in blue and UV-C regions; GO has the highest performance range in UV/vis and plasmonic sensors operating in UV-C; rGO has the highest performance range in UV/vis sensors working on near-infrared and UV-C. Additionally, rGO plasmonic sensors present an "oscillation of percentage variations" from visible to UV. Our study offers a strategy for creating a map to select the best substrate to develop selective APAP optical sensors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.