ArticleAnnals of surgery2025
Feasibility of Pure Laparoscopic Donor Right Hepatectomy Compared With Open Donor Right Hepatectomy: A Large Single-center Cohort Study.
Article in Annals of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk factors for morbidity in both donor and recipient following minimally invasive donor hepatectomy: a systematic review.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Advancing the standard in donor hepatectomy: reflections on pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy and the evolving role of minimally invasive approaches.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2026Article
- Achievements, Challenges and Promises of Minimally Invasive Liver Transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Review
- Surgical management of biliary fistula following associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy in pediatric hepatoblastoma: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to compare the morbidity of living donors and recipients after pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) and open donor right hepatectomy (ODRH).
backgroundDonor and recipient morbidity have not been sufficiently reported in large-scale comparisons of PLDRH and ODRH.
methodsThis retrospective study reviewed 3348 donors who underwent PLDRH (n = 329) and ODRH (n = 3019) and their corresponding recipients (n = 3348) between January 2014 and August 2023. Donor complications and recipient biliary complications within 90 days were evaluated before and after 1:3 propensity score matching (PSM). Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified significant risk factors for donor major and biliary complications, as well as recipient bile leakage and biliary stricture.
resultsFor donors, PLDRH had fewer overall complications than ODRH (0.9% vs 3.7%, P = 0.009), with no significant differences in major (Clavien-Dindo III/IV) complications ( P = 0.057) and biliary complications ( P = 0.067), despite the absence of biliary complications in PLDRH. However, PLDRH showed longer warm ischemic time and operation time, and higher peak aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels compared with ODRH in donors ( P < 0.001). These results remained consistent after PSM. Recipient biliary complications were comparable between PLDRH and ODRH, both before ( P = 0.806) and after PSM ( P = 0.149). Multiple portal veins were significant donor risk factors for major ( P = 0.022) and biliary complications ( P = 0.001). Separated multiple bile ducts were a common significant recipient risk factor for bile leakage ( P = 0.007) and biliary stricture ( P = 0.022).
conclusionsPLDRH could become the standard for donor right hepatectomy with careful consideration of portal and biliary variations for donor and recipient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39829418What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.