ArticleMicrosurgery2025
Long-Term Follow-Up After the Charles Procedure: Possibilities for Minimally Invasive Reconstructive Lymphedema Surgery With Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis: A Report of Four Cases.
Article in Microsurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lymphovenous anastomosis: microsurgical innovation and clinical outcomes in breast cancer-related lymphedema care.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Charles procedure (CP) is a potentially devastating treatment; however, in cases of an end stage of untreated or improperly treated lymphedema, it is the ultimate surgical therapy. As a life-saving solution, it quickly relieves patients with giant, hypertrophic extremities, mostly in ambulation and hygiene maintenance. Nevertheless, long-term results may disappoint both doctors and patients, who struggle with social stigma, the need for lifelong compression, massive lymphoedema in the distal parts of the feet, badly fitting shoes, excessive skin fibrosis, severe keratinization of skin-grafted surfaces, periodic lymphorrhea from the resected areas, or acute and chronic inflammation. For these reasons, patients may seek further surgical help, even many years after treatment. This article describes findings in fluorescent lymphography with indocyanine green (ICG-L) in four patients (49, 56, 56 years old females and 35 years old males) after CP and outcomes of treatment with lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA). In all patients, nonresected areas of the dorsum of the feet showed massive lymphedema stage II to III with dermal backflow (DB). In two patients, resected and skin-grafted areas showed deep subfascial lymphatics with lazy flow and no DB. In the remaining two cases, resected areas showed massive DB. Patients were reluctant to undergo further extensive surgical treatment with lymph node transfers due to the trauma experienced after CP. Since they still struggle with residual lower extremity lymphedema in unresected areas of the lower limbs, we performed minimally invasive, physiologic LVA surgeries in their feet, and in one patient in proximal thighs. In all cases, the postoperative course was uneventful. The treatment brought relief, reducing the circumference of the feet by ~2 cm, and allowed the return to previously used shoes in a follow-up of 18-36 months. This is the first report of ICG-L findings in CP patients, who benefit from minimal invasive LVA surgery. This information might help improve the life quality of patients after CP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.