Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39829342›Full record

ReviewJournal of internal medicine2025

Challenges and opportunities in organ donation after circulatory death.

Mathias Vidgren, Capucine Delorme, Gabriel C Oniscu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07341516 (Worldwide Assessment of Deceased Donor Kidney Utilization), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07341516 enrolling by invitationnot on this map

Worldwide Assessment of Deceased Donor Kidney Utilization: Disparities, Temporal Trends, and Outcomes

TypeobservationalSponsorParis Translational Research Center for Organ TransplantationRan2025 to 2026Enrolled300,000ConditionsKidney Failure, Kidney Transplant, Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mathias VidgrenDivision of Transplantation Surgery, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Capucine DelormeDivision of Transplantation Surgery, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gabriel C OniscuDivision of Transplantation Surgery, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1714-920X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, there has been resurgence in donation after circulatory death (DCD). Despite that, the number of organs transplanted from these donors remains low due to concerns about their function and a lack of an objective assessment at the time of donation. This overview examines the current DCD practices and the classification modifications to accommodate regional perspectives. Several risk factors underscore the reluctance to accept DCD organs, and we discuss the modern strategies to mitigate them. The advent of machine perfusion technology has revolutionized the field of DCD transplantation, leading to improved outcomes and better organ usage. With many strategies at our disposal, there is an urgent need for comparative trials to determine the optimal use of perfusion technologies for each donated organ type. Additional progress in defining therapeutic strategies to repair the damage sustained during the dying process should further improve DCD organ utilization and outcomes. However, there remains wide variability in access to DCD donation and transplantation, and organizational efforts should be doubled up with consensus on key ethical issues that still surround DCD donation in the era of machine perfusion.

Indexed as

DeathTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue DonorsHumansOrgan PreservationOrgan TransplantationPerfusionRisk FactorsDCDischaemia reperfusion injurymachine perfusionNRPorgan repairoutcomesrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID39829342
PMCPMC11771584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.