ReviewChemical research in toxicology2025
Analytical Quality Evaluation of the Tox21 Compound Library.
Review in Chemical research in toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expanded Tox21 Biological Assay Panel for the Prediction of Drug-Induced Liver Injury and Cardiotoxicity.Environmental health perspectives · 2026Article
- Democratizing Artificial Intelligence in Toxicology: Real-World Applications and Automated Computational Workflows.Chemical research in toxicology · 2026Review
- New Docking, Molecular Dynamics, and QSAR Models to Predict Disruption of Human and Rat Transthyretin Function by Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS).Chemical research in toxicology · 2026Article
- Impact of Chemical Quality on High-Throughput in Vitro Assays: A Tox21 Study.Chemical research in toxicology · 2026Article
- Catechol Tetrahydroisoquinolines: Synthesis, Biological Activity, and Natural Occurrence inACS omega · 2025Article
- Reference library for suspect screening of environmental toxicants using ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry.Communications chemistry · 2025Article
- CombinedJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Gaining confidence inNAM journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The analytical quality of compounds subjected to high-throughput screening (HTS) impacts accurate interpretation of assay results, with poor quality samples potentially leading to false negatives or positives. The Tox21 "10K" library consists of over 8900 unique compounds, spanning a diverse landscape of environmental and pharmaceutical chemicals, posing opportunities and challenges for analytical quality control (QC) determinations. Tox21 sample plates stored in DMSO at ambient conditions for 0 (T0) and/or 4 months (T4), totaling more than 13K unique sample identifiers (Tox21 IDs), were subjected to various analyses, including liquid and gas chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS, GC-MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Results for each sample at T0 or T4 underwent expert review and, where possible, a QC grade conveying purity, identity, and concentration was assigned. Herein, we relate details of the methods applied and report on the original (v0) Tox21 ID level results. Thirteen QC grades were condensed to 5 quality scores to aid global analysis, resulting in reinterpretation and improvement of >700 sample grades. Of the 92% T0 samples successfully graded, 76% exceeded 90% purity. For 76% of samples that were also tested at T4, 89% showed no evidence of sample loss or degradation. Prioritized quality bins were used to summarize thousands of replicate sample-level QC results to a compound-level QC score to support structure-based analyses. ToxPrint chemotype analysis identified structural features enriched in unstable compounds, as well as in high and low quality T0 subsets. Predicted vapor pressure was weakly correlated with low-concentration QC indicators, reflecting likely entanglement with method amenability and quality issues. Finally, an ongoing EPA effort to re-evaluate the original QC spectra is generating insights that will further modify QC grades. Tox21 QC spectra and results will be made available in a new public QC browser, facilitating further evaluation to support HTS interpretation and modeling applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.