Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39829221›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025

Species-habitat networks reveal conservation implications that other community analyses do not detect.

Zhaoke Dong, Andrew J Bladon, Coline C Jaworski, Richard F Pywell, Ben A Woodcock, William R Meek, Peter Nuttall, Lynn V Dicks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Species-habitat networks reveal conservation implications that other community analyses do not detect.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhaoke DongCollege of Plant Health and Medicine, Qingdao Agriculture University, Qingdao, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4462-1162
Andrew J BladonDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2677-1247
Coline C JaworskiDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6136-8656
Richard F PywellUK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, UK.
Ben A WoodcockUK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0300-9951
William R MeekUK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, UK.
Peter NuttallUK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, UK.
Lynn V DicksDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8304-4468

Funding

China Scholarship Council 202108370189Natural Environment Research Council NE/N014472/2Natural Environment Research Council NE/V006444/1Natural Environment Research Council NE/V007173/1Natural Environment Research Council NE/V007548/1Natural Environment Research Council NE/W005050/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grassland restoration is an important conservation intervention supporting declining insect pollinators in threatened calcareous grassland landscapes. While the success of restoration is often quantified using simple measures of diversity or similarity to target communities, these measures do not capture all fundamental aspects of community reconstruction. Here, we develop species-habitat networks that aim to define habitat-level foraging dependencies of pollinators across restored grassland landscapes and compare their value to these more conventional measures of community restoration. We assessed this across Salisbury Plain (UK), which represents the largest area of chalk grassland in northwestern Europe, encompassing six distinct management types aimed at the restoration and maintenance of species-rich calcareous grassland. Sites that were previously disturbed or reverting from arable agriculture were comparable with those of ancient grasslands in terms of pollinator abundance and species richness. However, intensively managed grasslands exhibited notably lower values across nearly all measured indicators, including flower and pollinator richness and abundance, than ancient grasslands, with unmanaged grasslands following closely behind. This underscores the need for caution with both long-term neglect and highly intensive management. Applying our species-habitat network approach, we found that pollinator communities in grasslands recovering from past military disturbance showed stronger modular associations with those in ancient grasslands than areas recovering from intensive agriculture. This highlights the importance of habitat history in shaping restoration trajectories. We propose that species-habitat networks should be part of the standard analytical toolkit assessing the effectiveness of restoration at landscape scale, particularly for mobile species such as insects.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemGrasslandInsectaAnimalsBiodiversityPollinationbumblebeebutterflycalcareous grasslandinteraction webmodularitypollinatorsrestorationspecialization

Identifiers

PMID39829221
PMCPMC11744225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.