ArticleThe Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences2025
Effect of platelet-rich plasma and platelet-rich fibrin on healing of burn wound with dual-species biofilm.
Article in The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-Action Regenerative Therapies: Regeneration and Antimicrobial Effects of Platelet- and Marrow-Derived Biologics.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Effect of platelet-rich plasma and platelet-rich fibrin on healing of burn wound with dual-species biofilm.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the impact of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) on burn wound with dual-species biofilm. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) were applied to infect the burn wound in rats to establish a dual-species biofilm model. After infection, the wound was treated with ionized silver (AG), PRF, and PRP. Silver scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to assess adhesion after infection. PRF and PRP reduced wound size from day 8 after burn injuries, while AG significantly promoted burn wound healing at day 12. New collagen was formed in the shortest time in PRF and PRP groups compared to AG and control groups. PRF and PRP greatly lowered the bacterial numbers in wounds with S. aureus and P. aeruginosa biofilm, whereas AG showed weak bacteriostatic effects. AG, PRF, and PRP treatments significantly reduced inflammatory mediators and induced VEGFA. However, AG treatment increased TNF-α. PRF and PRP accelerate wound healing in the presence of dual-species biofilm infection and show strong antibacterial activity against S. aureus and P. aeruginosa, indicating that PRF and PRP could be potential therapies for burn wounds with dual-species biofilm infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.