ArticleBrain and behavior2025
The Cognitive Footprint of Medication Use.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Classifying and visualizing medication use in the ABCD study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Classifying and visualizing medication use in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe cognitive side-effects of medication are common, but often overlooked in practice, and not routinely considered in interventional trials or post-market surveillance. The cognitive footprint of a medication seeks to quantify the impact of its cognitive effects based on magnitude, duration, and interaction with other factors, evaluated across the exposed population.
methodsBayesian multivariable regression analysis of retrospective population-based cross-sectional cohorts.
resultsWe replicate positive and negative cognitive effects of commonly used medications in UK Biobank, and extend observed associations to two additional cohorts, the EPIC Norfolk, and the Caerphilly Prospective Cohort. We quantify the resultant cumulative impact at the population level given known patterns of prescribing and compare it with exemplar common diseases.
conclusionThe cognitive side-effects of commonly used drugs may have significant impact at the population level. Consideration should be given to a routine structured assessment of cognition in interventional trials and post-market surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.