ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2025
Current Practices and Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence in the Clinical Management of Eating Disorders: Insights From Clinicians and Community Participants.
Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinicians' Attitudes and Perceptions on the Adoption of AI in Mental Health Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Benchmarking Generative Artificial Intelligence Against Human Judgment in Eating Disorder Case Recognition and Treatment Recommendations.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Nutrition: Current Uses, Challenges, and Opportunities.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Leveraging Technology to Enhance Eating Disorder Treatment Outcomes.The Psychiatric clinics of North America · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Eating Disorder Treatment: A Qualitative Analysis of Clinical Opportunities, Barriers, and Ethical Considerations From Multi-Disciplinary Focus Groups.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Effect of ChatGPT use on eating disorders and body image.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Review
- From Skepticism to Support: Addressing Clinician and Patient Concerns About AI in Eating Disorder Care.The International journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Smartphone Technology to Enhance Personalized Assessment and Treatment for Eating Disorders.The International journal of eating disorders · 2025Review
- AI-Readiness in the Eating Disorders Field.The International journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- All in the Name of Artificial Intelligence: A Commentary on Linardon (2025).The International journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- Perceived Barriers and Facilitators of Use of Artificial Intelligence in Eating Disorder Care: A Commentary on Linardon et al. (2025).The International journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- From promise to practice: insights into ChatGPT-4o use in child and adolescent mental health from professionals.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in psychiatry: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveArtificial intelligence (AI) could revolutionize the delivery of mental health care, helping to streamline clinician workflows and assist with diagnostic and treatment decisions. Yet, before AI can be integrated into practice, it is necessary to understand perspectives of these tools to inform facilitators and barriers to their uptake. We gathered data on clinician and community participant perspectives of incorporating AI in the clinical management of eating disorders.
methodA survey was distributed internationally to clinicians (n = 116) with experience in eating disorder treatment (psychologists, psychiatrists, etc.) and community participants (n = 155) who reported occurrence of eating disorder behaviors.
results59% of clinicians reported use of AI systems (most commonly ChatGPT) for professional reasons, compared to 18% of community participants using them for help-related purposes. While more than half of clinicians (58%) and community participants (53%) were open for AI to help support them, fewer were enthusiastic about their integration (40% and 27%, respectively) and believed that they would significantly improve client outcomes (28% and 13%, respectively). Nine in 10 agreed that AI may be improperly used if individuals are not adequately trained, and could pose new data privacy and security concerns. Most agreed that AI will be convenient, beneficial for administrative tasks, and an avenue for continuous support, but will never outperform human clinicians on relational skills.
conclusionWhile many clinicians and community participants are open to the use of AI in eating disorder treatment and recognize its possible wide-ranging benefits, most remain cautious and uncertain about its implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.