Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39828934›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Patients' Attitudes Towards Integrating Environmental Sustainability Into Healthcare Decision-Making: An Interview Study.

Eva S Cohen, Dionne S Kringos, Fleur Grandiek, Lisanne H J A Kouwenberg, Nicolaas H Sperna Weiland, Cristina Richie, Wouter J K Hehenkamp, Johanna W M Aarts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eva S CohenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9679-8875
Dionne S KringosAmsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Global Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fleur GrandiekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lisanne H J A KouwenbergAmsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Global Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nicolaas H Sperna WeilandCentre for Sustainable Healthcare, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cristina RichieDepartment of Philosophy, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Wouter J K HehenkampDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johanna W M AartsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

This study was supported by the Doctoral School, Amsterdam UMC PhD Scholarship.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe ethical obligation to reduce the environmental impact of healthcare systems prompts an exploration of if and when environmental concerns should be integrated into clinical decision-making. In this study, we aimed to elucidate patients' attitudes regarding the provision of environmental information in healthcare decision-making and to identify preferred approaches for integrating these considerations into patient-provider consultations.

methodsThis interview study served as an in-depth follow-up of a survey study on gynaecological patients' perspectives on environmental sustainability within healthcare settings. We conducted semistructured interviews with 14 patients from two Dutch outpatient clinics between February and May 2024. We employed reflexive thematic analysis to analyse the data.

resultsFive main themes were developed from the data: (1) Patients are an integral part of the transition to sustainable healthcare, (2) Patients are open to information on environmental impact of healthcare, (3) Information on environmental impact should be tailored to the individual patient and context, (4) Patients vary in preferences for involvement in decision-making related to environmental sustainability and (5) Patients prioritize individual health over environmental concerns in healthcare decision-making.

conclusionThe findings of our study underscore the importance of integrating sustainability into clinical decision-making, aligning with bioethical principles and the expectations and goals of patients. By ensuring that environmental considerations are introduced in a personalized and context-appropriate manner within patient-provider interactions, healthcare can foster greater support for sustainable practices. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients were involved in developing the pre-interview questionnaire. The preliminary results of the study were presented to healthcare professionals from various backgrounds during a meeting of the Dutch Green Care Alliance, after which the input was incorporated into the interpretation of the study results. Finally, the complete manuscript was presented to representatives from the Dutch Patient Federation to obtain their input on the interpretation and implications of our research. The interpretation of our results aligned with the findings from their recent national inquiries, which included data from over 9300 patients within their network. Consequently, no changes were made to the manuscript's discussion.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedDelivery of Health CareEnvironmentPatient ParticipationAdultAgedClimate ChangeFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSurveys and Questionnairesclimate changeenvironmental impactenvironmental sustainabilitygreen bioethicsgreen informed consentshared decision‐making

Identifiers

PMID39828934
PMCPMC11743189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.