Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39828890›Full record

ArticleInternational forum of allergy & rhinology2025

Persistent Eosinophilic Inflammation Is Not a Feature of Type 2 CRS Patients Failing Anti-IL-5R Therapy and Requiring Class Switching to Anti-IL-4/13.

Peta-Lee Sacks, Christian M Meerwein, Peter Earls, Cedric Thiel, Christine Choy, Raewyn G Campbell, Raymond Sacks, Larry Kalish, Richard J Harvey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International forum of allergy & rhinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Peta-Lee SacksRhinology and Skull Base Research Group, St Vincent's Centre for Applied Medical Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7828-8305
Christian M MeerweinRhinology and Skull Base Research Group, St Vincent's Centre for Applied Medical Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Peter EarlsSchool of Clinical Medicine, St Vincent's Healthcare Clinical Campus, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Cedric ThielRhinology and Skull Base Research Group, St Vincent's Centre for Applied Medical Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Christine ChoyRhinology and Skull Base Research Group, St Vincent's Centre for Applied Medical Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Raewyn G CampbellRhinology and Skull Base Research Group, St Vincent's Centre for Applied Medical Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Raymond SacksRhinology and Skull Base Research Group, St Vincent's Centre for Applied Medical Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Larry KalishRhinology and Skull Base Research Group, St Vincent's Centre for Applied Medical Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Richard J HarveyRhinology and Skull Base Research Group, St Vincent's Centre for Applied Medical Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6942-8975

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundType 2 inflammation dominates eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (eCRS) and adult onset asthma. IL-4, -5, and -13 are prominent disease mediators. Disease control can be achieved with biologic therapies. However, despite some patients entering remission, others experience poor control.

aimWe aimed to describe eCRS patients treated with anti-IL-5R antibody (benralizumab) and assess characteristics between responders and those requiring class switching to anti-IL-4/13R (dupilumab).

methodA retrospective cohort study was performed on consecutive adult patients with eCRS and asthma who had commenced benralizumab.  Disease control was defined as controlled or poorly controlled (EPOS2020 partly control/uncontrolled). Poorly controlled patients were switched to dupilumab.  Baseline and post-IL-5R characteristics including age, sex, 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score, and serum/tissue eosinophilia were assessed. Disease control post-class switching was reassessed. Factors predicting poorly controlled disease on anti-IL-5R therapy were sought.

resultsFifty patients were assessed (51.44 ± 12.73 years, 56% female). Poorly controlled disease on anti-IL-5R requiring class switch to dupilumab was seen in 42%. Poorly controlled patients were younger (46.14 ± 10.76 vs. 55.28 ± 12.83 years, p = 0.01) with higher baseline SNOT-22 (61.42 ± 19.19 vs. 42.32 ± 21.55, p < 0.01). Baseline ACQ scores and eosinophil count (0.78 ± 0.49 vs. 0.62 ± 0.34 × 10

conclusionNeither eosinophilia nor its reduction predicted a non-responder group to anti-IL-5R therapy. While the eosinophil population may be a good marker for the CRS phenotype seen in nasal polyps, it is unlikely to be the cell population driving the disease process.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAsthmaEosinophiliaRhinitisSinusitisAdultAgedChronic DiseaseDrug SubstitutionEosinophilsFemaleHumansInflammationMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, Interleukin-5Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedbenralizumabdupilumabReceptors, Interleukin-5biologicseosinophilsrhinosinusitis

Identifiers

PMID39828890
PMCPMC12135457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.