Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39828881›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2026

Attendance of Underserved Populations at Field-Based Health Services Events: Application of Quasi-Experimental Methods that Accommodate the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Leslie D Leve, David S DeGarmo, Jacob Searcy, Elizabeth L Budd, Jorge I Ramírez García, Anne Marie Mauricio, William A Cresko

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05082935 (Optimizing SARS-CoV-2 Testing and Promotores Interventions to Serve Latinx Communities), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05082935 nacompletednot on this map

Optimizing SARS-CoV-2 Testing and Promotores Interventions to Serve Latinx Communities

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OregonRan2021 to 2023Enrolled1,463ConditionsHealth Behavior, Health Care UtilizationArmsPhase II Promotores de Salud, Phase I Promotores de Salud Outreach
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leslie D LevePrevention Science Institute, University of Oregon, 1600 Millrace Dr., Suite 109, Eugene, OR, USA. leve@uoregon.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3061-4524
David S DeGarmoPrevention Science Institute, University of Oregon, 1600 Millrace Dr., Suite 109, Eugene, OR, USA.
Jacob SearcyDepartment of Data Science, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
Elizabeth L BuddPrevention Science Institute, University of Oregon, 1600 Millrace Dr., Suite 109, Eugene, OR, USA.
Jorge I Ramírez GarcíaPrevention Science Institute, University of Oregon, 1600 Millrace Dr., Suite 109, Eugene, OR, USA.
Anne Marie MauricioPrevention Science Institute, University of Oregon, 1600 Millrace Dr., Suite 109, Eugene, OR, USA.
William A CreskoInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.

Funding

Supplement to Prevention Research Center: Parenting Among Women Who Are Opioid Users, Project 2P50DA048756 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI FISHER, PHILIP A, LEVE, LESLIE DIANE · 2019 to 2023
$18.0M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA048756NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA048756-02S2NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA048756-04S2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the ability to receive health care services. Field-based health services became a logistically feasible alternative to medical center-based care. We compared two different field-based approaches to the delivery of SARS-CoV-2 testing and health education services for Latine communities using a quasi-experimental design that included propensity score matching to accommodate the challenges posed to research by the pandemic. From September 2021 through October 2022, we held 434 testing events, of which 234 used a geolocation approach and 200 used a partner-located approach to determine the location of the health services (n = 68 field sites in Oregon). We hypothesized that partner-located sites would obtain higher numbers of tests collected relative to geolocated sites, and that longer drive times to testing sites would be associated with lower testing rates. There were no differences in the number of tests collected by geolocated versus partner-located sites, controlling for population size and time-varying pandemic vulnerabilities measured as COVID-19 cases and deaths. Prior to propensity score weighting, a longer drive time to the testing site (both site types) was associated with a lower likelihood of total tests (IRR = .87, p < .01, CI [0.54, 0.92]), of Latine tests (IRR = .69, p < .001, CI [0.56, 0.84]), and of male tests collected (IRR = .67, p < .05, CI [0.47, 0.94]). The site's number of prior tests was associated with a significant 2% increase in tests collected and the prior week's number of county deaths was associated with a roughly 30% decrease in the likelihood of tests collected. However, the reduced testing rate when the death rate was higher was less likely in geolocated sites (IRR = 1.55, p < .001, CI [1.20, 2.01]). Implications for the utility of propensity score matching and time-varying covariates to accommodate pandemic challenges posed to research are discussed. Clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT05082935. Date of registration: 10/15/2021.

Indexed as

COVID-19Vulnerable PopulationsCOVID-19 TestingFemaleHumansMaleOregonPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Community participationCOVID-19 testingImplementation scienceLatino

Identifiers

PMID39828881
PMCPMC12906540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.