ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025
What do the voice-related parameters tell us? The multiparametric index scores, cepstral-based methods, patient-reported outcomes, and durational measurements.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low-cost contact microphones for bedside voice assessment: proof of concept.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- On Acoustic Voice Quality Index measurement reliability in digital health applications: a narrative review and empirical evaluation of speech sample length requirements.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to identify how the acoustic parameters, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and durational measurements differ based on perceptually rated dysphonia severity and to investigate their relationship with dysphonia severity.
methodsOne hundred seventy-nine subjects (males-78, females-101; mean ± SD age of 47.79 ± 14.05 years) with various etiology of dysphonia were included in this prospective cohort study. The G parameter of GRBAS was used to rate dysphonia severity. The Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI v. 03.01), Acoustic Breathiness Index (ABI), and cepstral peak prominence-smoothed (CPPS) values for sustained vowel (CPPSsv) and connected speech (CPPScs) samples were obtained using the Praat software. The Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) and Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL) were used for PROs, and the maximum phonation time (MPT) and s/z ratio were measured as durational parameters.
resultsThe acoustic parameters, including AVQI and ABI scores, and CPPSsv and CPPScs values significantly differed based on dysphonia severity, particularly in those with moderate (G
conclusionsParticular attention should be paid to the AVQI and ABI scores, CPPsv and CPPcs values, VHI-10 scores, and MPT values since they provide valuable information for overall dysphonia severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.