ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025
Retrospective analysis of criteria for oncological completion surgery of neuroendocrine tumors of the appendix.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeNeuroendocrine neoplasms of the appendix (aNET) are rare tumors that are often diagnosed by pathology as an incidental finding after appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Several guidelines proposed risk criteria to indicate oncological completion surgery after appendectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of proposed criteria for completion surgery of aNET.
methodsPatients with aNET treated at ENETS center of excellence Marburg between 2002 and 2022 were retrieved from a prospective data base. Demographic data, histopathological findings, including formerly proposed criteria to indicate oncological completion surgery, histological results of the completion resection and disease-free survival were evaluated.
results82 patients with a median age of 35 (range 8-82) years were analysed. 72 (88%) patients underwent an emergency appendectomy because of acute appendicitis. 11 (13%) patients received an ileocecal resection or right hemicolectomy. Seven (8.5%) patients had lymph node metastases and three (3.6%) patients had distant metastases at the initial operation. 27 (33%) patients underwent completion surgery by right hemicolectomy according to guideline criteria, but postoperative histology detected lymph node and distant metastases in only six (22%) and zero patients resulting in an overtreatment of 21 (75%) patients. A tumor size of > 2 cm was the only significant criterion which was associated with lymph node metastases (p < 0.05). After a median follow-up of 62 months (range 2-264) 76 (96%) of the patients in stages I to III were alive with no evidence of disease.
conclusionaNET have an excellent prognosis in stages I-III and distant metastases are rare. Formerly proposed criteria for oncological completion surgery have to be adopted and discussed for every patient, as they might result in an overtreatment in at least 75% of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.