ArticleScientific reports2025
Experimental investigation of nanoclay performance as an assistant in water based enhanced oil recovery method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The experimental analysis of nanoclay in enhanced oil recovery applications was rarely investigated. The main goal of this study is to analyze the flowing behavior of nanoclay as enhanced oil recovery fluid. After finding the most stable enhanced oil recovery fluid, the flow characteristic measurement was done. All of the experiments were performed in the ambient pressure and temperature where all of the core samples and thin sections are oil-wet in nature. Capabilities of nanoclay as an enhanced oil recovery fluid are determined in the static flow and flooding tests. The results of the Amott test (static) showed that the oil recovery from the core was 2.3 mL in the cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide base fluid, 2.1 mL in the nano-fluid (nanoclay + cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide), and 1.8 mL in the nanoclay. In the dynamic test, by examining the flooding test in the two modes of nano-fluid (approximately 3.5 h) and nanoclay (approximately 2.5 h) and recording the production curve over time, it was observed that the final production rate for the nano-fluid was approximately 79% and for the nanoclay, approximately 54.5% of the oil in-situ. Using nanoclay as an enhanced oil recovery fluid that is economical and environmentally friendly is the main finding of this study. Finally, it is founded that the optimum enhanced oil recovery fluid during the experiments is 0.5 wt% cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide and 0.1 wt% nanoclay that is called nano-fluid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.