Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39828748›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Experimental investigation of nanoclay performance as an assistant in water based enhanced oil recovery method.

Hamid Mohammad Soleimani, Mohammad Taghi Sadeghi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hamid Mohammad SoleimaniSchool of Chemical, Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Narmak, Tehran, 16846-13114, Iran.
Mohammad Taghi SadeghiSchool of Chemical, Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Narmak, Tehran, 16846-13114, Iran. sadeghi@iust.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The experimental analysis of nanoclay in enhanced oil recovery applications was rarely investigated. The main goal of this study is to analyze the flowing behavior of nanoclay as enhanced oil recovery fluid. After finding the most stable enhanced oil recovery fluid, the flow characteristic measurement was done. All of the experiments were performed in the ambient pressure and temperature where all of the core samples and thin sections are oil-wet in nature. Capabilities of nanoclay as an enhanced oil recovery fluid are determined in the static flow and flooding tests. The results of the Amott test (static) showed that the oil recovery from the core was 2.3 mL in the cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide base fluid, 2.1 mL in the nano-fluid (nanoclay + cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide), and 1.8 mL in the nanoclay. In the dynamic test, by examining the flooding test in the two modes of nano-fluid (approximately 3.5 h) and nanoclay (approximately 2.5 h) and recording the production curve over time, it was observed that the final production rate for the nano-fluid was approximately 79% and for the nanoclay, approximately 54.5% of the oil in-situ. Using nanoclay as an enhanced oil recovery fluid that is economical and environmentally friendly is the main finding of this study. Finally, it is founded that the optimum enhanced oil recovery fluid during the experiments is 0.5 wt% cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide and 0.1 wt% nanoclay that is called nano-fluid.

Indexed as

AmottCetyl trimethyl ammonium bromideContact angleEnhanced oil recoveryFloodingInterfacial tensionNanoclay

Identifiers

PMID39828748
PMCPMC11743599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.