ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Gender differences in self-reported participation in ultrasound-guided procedures: a retrospective analysis.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcross multiple procedural specialties, female trainees tend to perform fewer procedures and receive less autonomy than their male counterparts. However, there is currently no data on procedure contribution levels for radiology trainees.
objectiveTo evaluate whether there was a difference in the degree of reported participation in ultrasound-guided procedures between male and female trainees at our institution.
methodsThis retrospective study assessed for differences in the reported level of participation between male and female trainees in ultrasound (US) guided paracentesis and thoracentesis. We performed a radiology information system (RIS) search of US guided procedures performed on adult patients from 7/1/2018 to 2/29/2024. Trainee participation levels in the procedures were determined per available reports and classified into independently performed, assisted, or observed. We evaluated the differential reporting of procedure contributions for male and female trainees based on observed vs. expected frequencies, as well as the effect of the trainees' and supervising physicians' gender and experience level on these contributions.
resultsA total of 189 trainees (52 female, 137 male) and 58 supervising physicians (18 female and 40 male) were included. The study evaluated 4156 reports, which showed no difference in the percentage of independently completed procedures (females 80.9% vs. 81.9%, X
conclusionFemale radiology trainees report a similar percentage of independently performed procedures but a lower rate of active participation than male trainees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39828729What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.