ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
An alternative fixation for all mild and moderate hallux valgus cases enabling intraoperative readjustment.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a Co-Designed Patient Handout for Adults With Hallux Valgus.Musculoskeletal care · 2026Article
- Footwear Identity and Postoperative Experiences of White-Collar Women After Hallux Valgus Surgery: A Qualitative Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe development of a cost-effective and easily applicable fixation method to address all components of hallux valgus (HV) surgery is of great importance to the field. This study aims to assess the clinical efficacy of an alternative fixation method that combines the advantages aspects of commonly used distal osteotomy techniques and evaluate its level of applicability in the treatment of mild and moderate HV cases.
methodsThe retrospectively designed study was conducted at Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Adana, Türkiye. The inclusion criteria were as follows: having undergone distal metatarsal osteotomy, minimum duration of follow-up of twelve months, and the availability of dorsoplantar weight-bearing X-ray images of the foot performed preoperatively and at the follow-up visits. The analysis data included age, gender, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, the values of the length of the 1st metatarsal, hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA), rotation type of the first metatarsal (RTFM), and the position of the tibial sesamoid (TSP).
resultsA total of 82 files were available for analysis. The mean age of the patients was 40.5 ± 13.8 (Median = 43) years; 67 (81,7%) were female, and 15 (18.3%) were male. The mean operation duration was 33.2 ± 3.0 min. The mean follow-up period was 22.7 ± 7.0 months. There was a linear relationship between the average age of the patients and the shortness (mm) values (r = 0.466; p < 0.001). The HVA, IMA, DMAA, TSP, and VAS scores were lower in the patients after the operation compared to before values (p < 0.001). The preoperative assessment of RTFM identified 15 cases with an angular type, 38 cases with an intermediate type, and 29 cases with a round type. The postoperative mean AOFAS value was higher than the mean score before the operation (p < 0.001). A dramatic reduction was observed in postoperative IMA and DMAA values (p < 0.001).
conclusionThis study's findings demonstrate the benefits of a new fixation method for treating HV that is applicable to all mild and moderate HV cases. This method enables intraoperative readjustment without compromising the fixation strength and has a short learning curve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.