ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
Clinical features, treatment, and prognosis of secukinumab-induced inflammatory bowel disease.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shared inflammatory architecture and therapeutic tensions between psoriasis and Crohn's disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Case Report: Secukinumab (Interleukin-17 Inhibitor) and Ulcerative Colitis Flare - the Double-Edged Sword.Case reports in gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a rare adverse effect linked to secukinumab, with limited clinical data available. This study aimed to analyze the clinical features of secukinumab-induced IBD and to offer recommendations for the careful administration of secukinumab.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis by gathering case reports and case series of secukinumab-induced IBD through a database search, with data collected until September 30, 2024.
resultsA total of forty patients (21 males and 19 females) fulfilled the inclusion criteria, with a median age of 42 years (range 19, 70). The median time to IBD onset was 4 months following the initial dose (range 0.25, 53). The most common symptoms reported were abdominal pain (60.0%), diarrhea (37.5%), bloody diarrhea (32.5%), and fever (30.0%). Colonoscopy findings predominantly showed ulcers (62.5%) and inflammation (27.5%). Biopsy results revealed crypt microabscesses (22.5%), cryptitis (20.0%), inflammatory cellular infiltrates (20.0%), and both acute and chronic inflammation (22.5%). After discontinuation of secukinumab, patients reported symptom relief following treatment with systemic steroids (60.0%), targeted therapies (52.5%), and mesalamine (22.5%).
conclusionsComprehensive screenings are essential for patients prior to initiating secukinumab therapy. Gastrointestinal symptoms necessitate close monitoring during secukinumab treatment. Upon the diagnosis of IBD, secukinumab should be discontinued, and systemic steroid therapy should be initiated. Patients who do not respond or experience a relapse should be considered for immunosuppressive therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.