ArticleObesity (Silver Spring, Md.)2025
Development and validation of the Food Noise Questionnaire.
Article in Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07387796 (Clinical and Neurobehavioral Changes With GLP-1), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical and Neurobehavioral Changes With GLP-1 (Glucagon-like Peptide-1) Discontinuation
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- The influence of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, liraglutide, on dietary patterns and nutrient intakes in patients with obesity and prediabetes: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Trial
- Adaptive maintenance after incretin-induced weight loss: Moving beyond the continue-or-stop paradigm.Obesity pillars · 2026Article
- GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Weight Loss: A Critical Review of Mechanisms.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026Review
- Prevalence and Correlates of Perceived Food Noise Among U.S. Adults in a Nationally Representative Sample.Obesity science & practice · 2026Article
- Weight Self-Stigma and Food Noise During Post-Metabolic Bariatric Surgery Weight Stability.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2026Article
- Retrospective Assessment of Food Noise Changes After Initiation of Injectable Semaglutide for Weight Management in the USA: The INFORM Survey.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Listening to children with obesity: lived experiences of hunger, cravings, and satiety.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- "And just like that, quiet": a content analysis of TikTok videos on food noise.Nutrition & diabetes · 2026Article
- Psychometric Properties of the Italian Food Noise Questionnaire (FNQ) for the Assessment of Intrusive Food-Related Thoughts.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Voice of a Disease: Why Food Noise Can No Longer Be Ignored!Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2026Article
- Taking back control: The experience of adults using semaglutide and tirzepatide for obesity treatment - A qualitative study.Obesity pillars · 2026Article
- Bridging the nutrition guidance gap for GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy assisted weight loss: lessons from bariatric surgery.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2026Review
- Quieting "Food Noise": How GLP-1s and Mindfulness Rewire the Default Mode Network (DMN) and Reward Circuits.Cureus · 2026Review
- Response to Hayashi et al.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2025Article
- Development and validation of the Food Noise Questionnaire.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2025Article
- Experiences and Behavior During a Virtual Reality Buffet Simulation: A Secondary Analysis of a Ghrelin-Related Pharmacology Randomized Controlled Trial in People with Alcohol Use Disorder.Journal of medical extended realityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveFood noise has received attention in the media, although no validated questionnaires exist to measure it. This study developed and tested the reliability and validity of the Food Noise Questionnaire (FNQ).
methodsParticipants (N = 400) successfully completed, the FNQ and a demographic questionnaire and self-reported weight and height. A subsample (n = 150) completed the FNQ 7 days later for test-retest reliability, and this subsample's first FNQ data were subjected to exploratory factor analysis. The remaining subsample (n = 250) completed two preoccupation with food questionnaires to test convergent validity, along with mood, anxiety, and stress questionnaires to test for discriminant validity. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted using this subsample's FNQ data.
resultsData from 396 participants were analyzed (4 participants did not complete all FNQ items). The FNQ had excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach α = 0.93) and high test-retest reliability (r = 0.79; p < 0.001; mean [SD] = 7.4 [1.0] days between administration). Factor analyses found that the five FNQ items loaded onto a single factor, with good fit indices (χ
conclusionsThe FNQ provides a psychometrically reliable and valid measure of food noise, although further research is needed to evaluate its clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.