ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2025
Individualized autoregulation-guided arterial blood pressure management in neurocritical care.
Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time-resolved laser speckle contrast imaging (TR-LSCI) of cerebral blood flow response to intracranial pressure elevation.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Postoperative Neurocritical Care After Minimally Invasive Evacuation of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Neurocritical care · 2026Review
- Gastrointestinal Bleeding Risk Associated With Pulse Pressure in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Interpolation and Imputation Strategies for Missing Segments in Continuous Pressure-Flow Cerebral Bio-Signals: A Systematic Scoping Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Autoregulation-guided intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure targets in different subtypes and characteristics of traumatic brain injury.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Observational
- Time-Resolved Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (TR-LSCI) of Cerebral Blood Flow Response to Intracranial Pressure Elevation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Acute care of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.Neurological research and practice · 2025Article
- Bridging brain and lung: optimizing mechanical ventilation in acute brain injury.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Review
- Optimal mean arterial pressure and its objective statistical associations with clinical outcomes and multimodal monitoring cerebral physiology: A systematic scoping review.Physiological reports · 2025Article
- Anesthesia-related factors in the pathogenesis of postoperative cognitive dysfunction: a mechanistic perspective.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Advancing neurocritical care: Bridging molecular mechanisms and physiological monitoring to neurotherapeutics.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral autoregulation (CA) is the physiological process by which cerebral blood flow is maintained during fluctuations in arterial blood pressure (ABP). There are various validated methods to measure CA, either invasively, with intracranial pressure or brain tissue oxygenation monitors, or noninvasively, with transcranial Doppler ultrasound or near-infrared spectroscopy. Utilizing these monitors, researchers have been able to discern CA patterns in several pathological states, such as but not limited to acute ischemic stroke, spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, sepsis, and post-cardiac arrest, and they have found CA to be altered in these patients. CA disturbances predispose patients suffering from these ailments to worse outcomes. Much focus has been placed on CA monitoring in these populations, with an emphasis on arterial blood pressure optimization. Many guidelines recommend universal static ABP targets; however, in patients with altered CA, these targets may make them susceptible to hypoperfusion and further neurological injury. Based on this observation, there has been much investigation on individualized ABP goals and their effect on clinical outcomes. The scope of this review includes (1) a summary of the physiology of CA in healthy adults; (2) a review of the evidence on CA monitoring in healthy individuals; (3) a summary of CA changes and its effect on outcomes in various diseased states including acute ischemic stroke, spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, sepsis and meningitis, post-cardiac arrest, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, surgery, and moyamoya disease; and (4) a review of the current evidence on individualized ABP changes in various patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.