Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39827894›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Microbe2025

Prevalence, misclassification, and clinical consequences of the heteroresistant phenotype in Escherichia coli bloodstream infections in patients in Uppsala, Sweden: a retrospective cohort study.

Gabriel Heyman, Sofia Jonsson, Nikos Fatsis-Kavalopoulos, Karin Hjort, Hervé Nicoloff, Mia Furebring, Dan I Andersson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Microbe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Deciphering the Implications ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Heteroresistance to amikacin inMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gabriel HeymanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Västmanland County Hospital Västerås, Västerås, Sweden; Centre for Clinical Research Västmanland, Västmanland County Hospital, Uppsala University, Västerås, Sweden.
Sofia JonssonDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Nikos Fatsis-KavalopoulosDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Karin HjortDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Hervé NicoloffDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mia FurebringDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Dan I AnderssonDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. Electronic address: dan.andersson@imbim.uu.se.

Funding

Single Cell Analysis Core (Core C)U19AI158080 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LEVIN, BRUCE RICHARD · 2021 to 2025
$10.9M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI158080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotic heteroresistance is a common bacterial phenotype characterised by the presence of small resistant subpopulations within a susceptible population. During antibiotic exposure, these resistant subpopulations can be enriched and potentially lead to treatment failure. In this study, we examined the prevalence, misclassification, and clinical effect of heteroresistance in Escherichia coli bloodstream infections for the clinically important antibiotics cefotaxime, gentamicin, and piperacillin-tazobactam.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients (n=255) admitted to in-patient care and treated for E coli bloodstream infections within the Uppsala region in Sweden between Jan 1, 2014, and Dec 31, 2015. Patient inclusion criteria were admission to hospital on suspicion of infection, starting systemic antibiotics at the time of admission, positive blood cultures for the growth of E coli upon admission, and residency in the Uppsala health-care region at the time of admission. Exclusion criteria were growth of an additional pathogen than E coli in blood cultures taken at admission or previous inclusion of the patients in the study for another bloodstream infection. Antibiotic susceptibility of preserved blood culture isolates of E coli was assessed for cefotaxime, gentamicin, and piperacillin-tazobactam by disk diffusion and breakpoint crossing heteroresistance (BCHR) was identified using population analysis profiling. The clinical outcome parameters were obtained from patient records. The primary outcome variable was length of hospital stay due to the E coli bloodstream infection, defined as the time between admission and discharge from inpatient care as noted on the physician's notes. Secondary outcomes were time to fever resolution, admission to intermediary care unit or intensive care unit during time in hospital, switching or adding another intravenous antibiotic treatment, re-admission to hospital within 30 days of original admission, recurrent E coli infection within 30 days of admission to hospital, and all-cause mortality within 90 days of admission.

findingsA total of 255 participants with a corresponding E coli isolate (out of 500 screened for eligibility) met the inclusion criteria, with 135 female patients and 120 male patients. One (<1%) of 255 strains was BCHR for cefotaxime, 109 (43%) of 255 strains were BCHR for gentamicin, and 22 (9%) of 255 strains were BCHR for piperacillin-tazobactam. Clinical susceptibility testing misclassified 120 (96%) of 125 heteroresistant bacterial strains as susceptible. The BCHR phenotypes had no correlation to length of hospital stay due to the E coli bloodstream infection. However, patients with piperacillin-tazobactam BCHR strains who received piperacillin-tazobactam had 3·1 times higher odds for admittance to the intermediate care unit (95% CI 1·1-9·6, p=0·041) than the remainder of the cohort, excluding those treated with gentamicin. Similarly, those infected with gentamicin BCHR who received gentamicin showed higher odds for admittance to the intensive care unit (5·6 [1·1-42·0, p=0·043]) and mortality (7·1 [1·2-49·2, p=0·030]) than patients treated with gentamicin who were infected with non-gentamicin BCHR E coli.

interpretationIn a cohort of patients with E coli bloodstream infections, heteroresistance is common and frequently misidentified in routine clinical testing. Several negative effects on patient outcomes are associated with heteroresistant strains.

fundingWallenberg Foundation, Swedish Research Council, and US National Institutes Of Health.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCefotaximeFemaleGentamicinsHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedPhenotypeAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefotaximeGentamicinsPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination

Identifiers

PMID39827894
PMCPMC12004506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.