ArticleThe Science of the total environment2025
Enhancing prediction and inference of daily in-stream nutrient and sediment concentrations using an extreme gradient boosting based water quality estimation tool - XGBest.
Article in The Science of the total environment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fifteen Years of WRTDS for Advancing Water-Quality Science: A Review of Methodological Developments and Global Applications.Environmental science & technology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Estimating constituent loads in streams and rivers is a crucial but challenging task due to low-frequency sampling in most watersheds. While predictive modeling can augment sparsely sampled water quality data, it can be challenging due to the complex and multifaceted interactions between several sub-watershed eco-hydrological processes. Traditional water quality prediction models, typically calibrated for individual sites, struggle to fully capture these interactions. This study introduces XGBest, a machine learning-based tool, that integrates hydrological data, land cover, and physical watershed attributes at a regional scale to predict daily concentrations of Total Nitrogen (TN), Total Phosphorus (TP), and Total Suspended Solids (TSS). XGBest leverages 29 environmental variables, including daily and antecedent discharge, temporal features, and landscape characteristics, to comprehensively evaluate water quality dynamics across a large hydrologic region. To explore the robustness of the developed tool, XGBest was validated using observed water quality data in three different hydrologic regions in the eastern United States, encompassing 499 water quality monitoring sites characterized by diverse hydro-climatic conditions and watershed attributes. This study also employed the legacy United States Geological Survey (USGS) tools - LOADEST and WRTDS as benchmarks to evaluate the performance of XGBest in these regions. The results demonstrated that XGBest outperformed LOADEST and WRTDS in predictive accuracy and revealed critical insights into the spatial and temporal variability of nutrient and sediment loads. In addition, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values highlighted the importance of integrating static and dynamic watershed attributes, such as land cover, antecedent discharge, and seasonality, in capturing the complex concentration-discharge (C-Q) relationships. This study positions XGBest as a robust and scalable water quality prediction tool that bridges the gap between hydrology and broader environmental management. By combining multiple environmental factors into a unified predictive framework, XGBest enhances our understanding of water quality and supports more effective environmental monitoring and management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.