ArticleAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2025
Characterization of Clinicopathological Features and Autoantibody Profiles in Patients with Cutaneous Lupus Erythematous: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
Article in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cutaneous lupus erythematosus - from pathogenesis to targeted therapy.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2025Review
- Cytokines unveiled: their impact on oral and multisystem features of lupus erythematosus.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is an autoimmune condition characterized by a wide range of clinical manifestations and limited treatment options. There is little research on the impact of commonly used diagnostic tests including antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) on disease course or responsiveness to treatment.
objectiveThis single-center retrospective cohort study aims to address this gap by characterizing clinicopathological characteristics, patient demographics, and treatment response among patients with CLE.
methodsThe study included patients with a diagnosis of CLE based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes evaluated in the outpatient clinics of the Department of Dermatology at Michigan Medicine between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2022. Chart review was conducted to collect patient and clinical data including CLE subtype, patient demographics, disease course, presence of SLE, ANA and ENA results, and CLE treatments and response.
results390 patients with CLE were included, 86% (n = 334) of whom had biopsy-proven CLE. Most patients were female (77%), non-Hispanic (97%), and Caucasian (58%). Of all patients, 35% (n = 138) were ANA negative. The most common CLE treatments were antimalarials (86%, n = 336), topical steroids (85%, n = 331), systemic steroids (42%, n = 164), and mycophenolate mofetil (30%, n = 119). Treatment response was determined by clinician documentation and ranged from stabilization of disease to complete remission. Treatments with the highest CLE response rates included systemic steroids (84%, n = 138), antimalarials (63%, n = 212), belimumab (54%, n = 29), and topical steroids (50%, n = 165). Factors associated with lower response rates to antimalarials using chi-squared tests included anti-double stranded (ds) DNA (n = 54, 57% response among anti-dsDNA+ versus n = 165, 74% response among anti-dsDNA-), anti-Smith (n = 33, 54% versus n = 82, 72%), anti-RNP (n = 48, 56% versus n = 67, 73%), anti-SmRNP (n = 44, 54% versus n = 171, 74%), anti-chromatin (n = 33, 50% versus n = 179, 74%), SLE (n = 81, 57% versus n = 143, 79%), and ACLE subtype (n = 28, 58% versus n = 195, 71%). When controlling for demographics, CLE subtype, and presence of SLE using a logistic regression, factors associated with lower antimalarial response rates included anti-dsDNA (OR 0.5), anti-Smith (OR 0.5), and anti-chromatin (OR 0.6)
conclusionOur results suggest that numerous patient characteristics, namely the presence of ACLE, SLE, and its most commonly implicated autoantibodies (i.e., anti-dsDNA and anti-Smith), are associated with lower response rates to first-line therapies, including topical steroids and antimalarials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39827426What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.