ReviewEuropean journal of applied physiology2025
Impact loading exercise induced osteogenesis from childhood to early adulthood in tennis players aged 8-30 years.
Review in European journal of applied physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Inter-Limb Muscle Asymmetries in Youth Athletes: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Single-Leg Jump and Change of Direction Speed Outcomes.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Osteogenesis with impact-loading exercise is often assessed by the extra bone growth induced in the loaded arm of tennis players. We used PRISMA to explore % bone mineral content (BMC) and area (BA) asymmetry in players 8-30 years according to weekly training hours, age, sex, maturity, and bone segment. Proper statistics for 70 groups were extracted by two reviewers from 18 eligible studies of low risk of bias (< 35, STROBE) and good quality (> 70%). The quality of the review was high (AMSTAR, 81%). Using "random effects" we tested moderation-specific meta-comparisons and meta-regressions. The loaded bones % hypertrophy was higher in BMC (19%) than BA (10%), and, with BMC and BA merged, in boys (17%) than girls (13%), in humerus (19%) than radius-ulna (14%), and in pubertal (19%) players. Weekly training hours were more important (43%) than sex (17%), puberty (14%) and bone (15%) in BMC, and puberty (48%) was more important than weekly training hours (19%), sex (12%), and radius-ulna (5%) in BA. The loaded bones % hypertrophy correlated with weekly training hours highly (> 0.60) in all maturity groups for BMC and BA, and moderately (0.41) in early adults for BA; it also correlated with age (≥ 0.60) in children and peripubertal players, but not (0.037) with starting age. Impact loading exercise favors mineralization twice than bone expansion, while puberty favors bone expansion about three times more than mineralization. The bone gains are higher for boys than girls, and for peripubertal than older players. The bone growth implications are discussed considering limitations and future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39827423What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.