ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
getphylo: rapid and automatic generation of multi-locus phylogenetic trees.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapidly evolving aphid gall effector proteins exhibit saposin-like folds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Evidence supporting the first secondary chromosome in Actinobacteria as a hallmark of theMicrobial genomics · 2026Article
- Rapidly evolving aphid gall effector proteins exhibit saposin-like folds.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Unraveling rare codon bias in Actinomycetota: lineage-specific and 5' terminal enrichment across 1936 genomes.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- DNA barcoding and phylogenomics in mushrooms: current progress, challenges, and future prospects.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2026Review
- SeqForge: a scalable platform for alignment-based searches, motif detection, and sequence curation across meta/genomic datasets.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Pangenome mining of the Streptomyces genus redefines species' biosynthetic potential.Genome biology · 2025Article
- BGCFlow: systematic pangenome workflow for the analysis of biosynthetic gene clusters across large genomic datasets.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing amount of genomic data calls for tools that can create genome-scale phylogenies quickly and efficiently. Existing tools rely on large reference databases or require lengthy de novo calculations to identify orthologues, meaning that they have long run times and are limited in their taxonomic scope. To address this, we created getphylo, a python tool for the rapid generation of phylogenetic trees de novo from annotated sequences.
resultsWe present getphylo (Genbank to Phylogeny), a tool that automatically builds phylogenetic trees from annotated genomes alone. Orthologues are identified heuristically by searching for singletons (single copy genes) across all input genomes and the phylogeny is inferred from a concatenated alignment of all coding sequences by maximum likelihood. We performed a thorough benchmarking of getphylo against two existing tools, autoMLST and GTDB-tk, to show that it can produce trees of comparable quality in a fraction of the time. We also demonstrate the flexibility of getphylo across four case studies including bacterial and eukaryotic genomes, and biosynthetic gene clusters.
conclusionsgetphylo is a quick and reliable tool for the automated generation of genome-scale phylogenetic trees. getphylo can produce phylogenies comparable to other software in a fraction of the time, without the need large local databases or intense computation. getphylo can rapidly identify orthologues from a wide variety of datasets regardless of taxonomic or genomic scope. The usability, speed, flexibility of getphylo makes it a valuable addition to the phylogenetics toolkit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.