ArticleExperimental brain research2025
Integrating vestibular and visual cues for verticality perception.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Head orientation relative to gravity modulates perceptual reversals and the first percept on the Schröder staircase: a four-orientation study with a stationary display.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- A Sensory Adaptation Program for Individuals With Mal de Débarquement Syndrome: A Case Series.Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT · 2026Article
- Seasickness, Sea Legs, and Gravity: Suppression of Motion Sickness, Development of Sea Legs, The Role of the Striated Organelle in the Vestibular Efferent System.Audiology research · 2026Article
- Vision Transformer attention alignment with human visual perception in aesthetic object evaluation.PloS one · 2026Article
- What is Balance? A Vital Mechano-Regulation Paradigm.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Verticality is the perception of what's upright relative to gravity. The vestibular system provides information about the head's orientation relative to gravity, while visual cues influence the perception of external objects' alignment with the vertical. According to Bayesian integration, the perception of verticality depends on the relative reliability of visual and vestibular cues. Ambiguities in vestibular signals are resolved through visual information, with the brain integrating these cues alongside prior knowledge of the upright orientation. While it is established that both vestibular and visual cues contribute to verticality perception, the precise mechanisms underlying this integration remain unclear. Here we investigated how the human brain combines vestibular and visual cues to perceive verticality based on their reliability. We assessed verticality perception using a signal detection theory based visual verticality detection task. Participants were shown lines that were either vertical or tilted and asked to judge their orientation. To manipulate cue reliability, we used optokinetic stimulation for visual cues, galvanic vestibular stimulation for vestibular cues, and a combined visual-vestibular condition by simultaneously delivering optokinetic and galvanic vestibular stimulation. Sham stimulations were administered to control for non-specific effects. Our findings demonstrate that reductions in the reliability of visual and vestibular cues impair sensitivity to verticality, with visual cues exerting a more pronounced influence. Importantly, no changes in response bias were observed. The observed pattern aligns with a model in which the relative contributions of visual and vestibular inputs are determined by linear weightings and their combined summation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39827302What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.