Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39827302›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2025

Integrating vestibular and visual cues for verticality perception.

Catho Schoenmaekers, Floris L Wuyts, Elisa R Ferre

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. What is Balance? A Vital Mechano-Regulation Paradigm.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Catho SchoenmaekersLab for Equilibrium Investigations and Aerospace (LEIA), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8097-9778
Floris L WuytsLab for Equilibrium Investigations and Aerospace (LEIA), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Elisa R FerreSchool of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck University of London, Malet St, London, WC1E 7HX, UK. elisa.ferre@bbk.ac.uk.

Funding

Experimental Psychology Society 041/2020Research Foundation Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen) 1SF9122NResearch Foundation Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen) 1SF9124N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Verticality is the perception of what's upright relative to gravity. The vestibular system provides information about the head's orientation relative to gravity, while visual cues influence the perception of external objects' alignment with the vertical. According to Bayesian integration, the perception of verticality depends on the relative reliability of visual and vestibular cues. Ambiguities in vestibular signals are resolved through visual information, with the brain integrating these cues alongside prior knowledge of the upright orientation. While it is established that both vestibular and visual cues contribute to verticality perception, the precise mechanisms underlying this integration remain unclear. Here we investigated how the human brain combines vestibular and visual cues to perceive verticality based on their reliability. We assessed verticality perception using a signal detection theory based visual verticality detection task. Participants were shown lines that were either vertical or tilted and asked to judge their orientation. To manipulate cue reliability, we used optokinetic stimulation for visual cues, galvanic vestibular stimulation for vestibular cues, and a combined visual-vestibular condition by simultaneously delivering optokinetic and galvanic vestibular stimulation. Sham stimulations were administered to control for non-specific effects. Our findings demonstrate that reductions in the reliability of visual and vestibular cues impair sensitivity to verticality, with visual cues exerting a more pronounced influence. Importantly, no changes in response bias were observed. The observed pattern aligns with a model in which the relative contributions of visual and vestibular inputs are determined by linear weightings and their combined summation.

Indexed as

CuesOrientationSpace PerceptionVestibule, LabyrinthVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultGalvanic vestibular stimulationGravityOptokinetic stimulationVerticalityVisual vertical detection task

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.