ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel approach for target deconvolution from phenotype-based screening using knowledge graph.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Target identification and assessment in the era of AI.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026Review
- Fundamentals and emerging frontiers in p53-targeted drug development.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Review
- Relation-aware context aggregation framework for sparse knowledge graph completion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artemis: Harnessing Knowledge Graphs for Next-Generation Drug Target Prioritization.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Phenotypic Screening Coupled with AI-Driven Target Deconvolution Identifies α-Terthienyl as a Dual DPP-IV/HSD17β13 Modulator with Efficacy in a Mouse Model of MASLD.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- State-of-the-Art and Future Directions in Structural Proteomics.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deconvoluting drug targets is crucial in modern drug development, yet both traditional and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven methods face challenges in terms of completeness, accuracy, and efficiency. Identifying drug targets, especially within complex systems such as the p53 pathway, remains a formidable task. The regulation of this pathway by myriad stress signals and regulatory elements adds layers of complexity to the discovery of effective p53 pathway activators. Recent insights into p53 activation have led to two main screening strategies for p53 activators. The target-based approach focuses on p53 and its regulators (MDM2, MDMX, USP7, Sirt proteins), but requires separate systems for each target and may miss multi-target compounds. Phenotype-based screening can reveal new targets but involves a lengthy process to elucidate mechanisms and targets, hindering drug development. Knowledge graphs have emerged as powerful tools that offer strengths in link prediction and knowledge inference to address these issues. In this study, we constructed a protein-protein interaction knowledge graph (PPIKG) and pioneered an integrated drug target deconvolution system that combines AI with molecular docking techniques. Analysis based on the PPIKG narrowed down candidate proteins from 1088 to 35, significantly saving time and cost. Subsequent molecular docking led us to pinpoint USP7 as a direct target for the p53 pathway activator UNBS5162. Leveraging knowledge graphs and a multidisciplinary approach allows us to streamline the laborious and expensive process of reverse targeting drug discovery through phenotype screening. Our findings have the potential to revolutionize drug screening and open new avenues in pharmacological research, increasing the speed and efficiency of pursuing novel therapeutics. The code is available at https://github.com/Xiong-Jing/PPIKG .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.