ArticleScientific reports2025
Automated system for calving time prediction and cattle classification utilizing trajectory data and movement features.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- - Invited Review - Computer vision in precision livestock farming: artificial intelligence-driven technologies and applications for sustainable animal production.Animal bioscience · 2026Article
- Multi-camera spatiotemporal deep learning framework for real-time abnormal behavior detection in dense urban environments.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurately predicting the calving time in cattle is essential for optimizing livestock management and ensuring animal welfare. Our research focuses on developing a robust system for calving cattle classification and calving time prediction, utilizing 12-h trajectory data for 20 cattle. Our system classifies cattle as abnormal (requiring human assistance) or normal (not requiring assistance) and predicts calving times based on their individual behaviors. We employed a tailored YOLOv8 model for efficient and precise cattle detection, effectively filtering out noise such as people and trucks. Our Customized Tracking Algorithm (CTA) maintains continuous identity tracking for each cow, enabling accurate re-identification even during occlusions. To minimize some ID switching errors over extended tracking periods, we integrated IDs optimization in the CTA utilizing Global IDs identification. We extracted and compared three total movement features for classifying cattle as abnormal or normal. For predicting calving times for each cow, we utilized and compared three cumulative movement features. Our system is fully automated, detecting and tracking all 20 cattle continuously for 12 h without manual assistance, and achieving an overall accuracy of 99%. By comparing three features derived from the trajectory tracking data for each point in a frame, we achieve 100%, 95%, 85% accuracy in classifying cattle as abnormal or normal and predict their calving times with a precision of within the next 6 h, within the next 9 h, within the next 8 h, respectively. Our system enables farmers to provide timely assistance, ensuring the health and safety of both the cow and the calf. Furthermore, it aids in optimizing resource allocation and enhancing overall farm efficiency, emphasizing the critical importance of calving time prediction in sustainable livestock farming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.