ArticleScientific reports2025
Advancements in Frank's sign Identification using deep learning on 3D brain MRI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Frank's Sign as a Dose-Dependent Marker of White Matter Burden in CADASIL: A Brain MRI Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Frank's sign (FS) is a diagnostic marker associated with aging and various health conditions. Despite its clinical significance, there lacks a standardized method for its identification. This study aimed to develop a deep learning model for automated FS detection in 3D facial images derived from MRI scans. Four deep learning architectures were evaluated for FS segmentation on a dataset of 400 brain MRI scans. The optimal model was subsequently validated on two external datasets, comprising 300 brain MRI scans each with varying FS presence. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were employed to assess model performance. The U-net architecture demonstrated superior performance in terms of accuracy and efficiency. On the validation datasets, the model achieved a DSC of 0.734, an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.865, and an area under the ROC curve greater than 0.9 for FS detection. Additionally, the model identified optimal voxel thresholds for accurate FS classification, resulting in high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy metrics. This study successfully developed a deep learning model for automated FS segmentation in MRI scans. This tool has the potential to enhance FS identification in clinical practice and contribute to further research on FS and its associated health implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.